Those who say climate change is the biggest challenge are mentally challenged

On August 2, the Prez introduced his "Clean Power Plan" in a speech at the White House. He told all assembled that, "We only get one home. We only get one planet."
What would we do without the World's Smartest Man bestowing on us such esoteric but crucial information?
The plan seeks to slash carbon emissions by 32 percent from 2005 levels by 2030. It will also encourage solar and wind energy. You know, because they've worked so brilliantly so far and there's such a market for them. Solyndra ring a bell, anyone?  I'll refresh your memory: It was a solar power start-up company that received federal grants as part of Obama's stimulus package in 2009. Just two years later, it collapsed, leaving hundreds of millions that the taxpayer has to cover.
Wind power cannot be relied upon, either. All it does is blight the off-shore with huge wind turbines which don't deliver in energy costs what it takes to construct them. 
Obama has said that climate change is the biggest issue facing our children and grandchildren.
"If you believe like I do that we can't condemn our kids and grandkids to a planet that's beyond fixing, then I'm asking you to share this message with your friends and family," Barry Hussein said.
Grandchildren? Let's take one generation's worry at a time, Dear Leader. The children will long have been either beheaded or converted to radical Islam by the time carbon levels will have reached that 32 percent reduction.
The grandchildren won't understand the snake-oil salesman words of Obama today, because they will be bilingual in Spanish and Arabic—two languages that go great together, just ask the Moors.
I have a question for you, dear reader. Has Friends of the Earth or the Sierra Club ever hounded anybody in the black or other minority communities into environmental-friendliness? Hell, no. These environmental groups consist of sanctimonious white people solely to bully, intimidate, harass and browbeat other white people.
You see, young 'uns, the longer you live, the more this stuff dawns on you. I know you weren't shown nor encouraged to question what you were taught or to consider the other side. Not in elementary school, middle school, high school or college. You've lived your whole lives thus far, towing the party line and being of the opinion that conservatives are unenlightened, boorish, unsophisticated vandals who need defeating. You call them evil, even though you don't believe in evil, because you don't believe Satan exists, because you don't believe in God.
The question has been asked many, many times. Where's the proof of global warming, or even of climate change? The best we get is An Inconvenient Truth, a film that follows around the lecture circuit a man whose house gives off more carbon dioxide in one month than the average American household does in a year.
Why have liberals abandoned the Socratic method? Why are they so afraid of points of view which question theirs that they forbid debate? All they ever have to offer are personal opinions and a few "facts" they read in Mother Jones or Rolling Stone. When asked for proof that those who dare to go against politically correct ideology are wrong, liberals stumble and parry. They won't provide facts; they can't provide them; and they can't provide them because they do not exist to back up their silly assertions. "Well, I think" said in a haughty manner is not a signal that facts or proof are going to be provided during the ensuing harangue.
Boston, Massachusetts had a record 108.6 inches of snowfall over the past winter. That's 9,000 Olympic-sized swimming pools worth of snow. A mound of snow and ice in a makeshift snowfield in South Boston was still alive and well in June. Maybe that's due to all the rubbish and dirt mixed within it. Nevertheless, from whence did all that snow come if it's so mild in the Arctic that all the polar ice is melting away? How and/or why did a location only 42 degrees north experience weather that would have taken Roald Amundsen's breath away?
Research has demonstrated that violent storm activity has decreased, not increased, over the past thirty years. Archaeologists and historians have said that wine-quality grapes grew in London one thousand years ago. That time period, the Medieval Warm Period, was warmer than today by nearly five degrees Celsius. Man was not around 120,000 years ago when glaciers melted and seas rose by eighteen to twenty feet. More than 30,000 scientists have declared that natural factors determine carbon dioxide levels and that there is no impending catastrophe on the horizon.
Even the co-founder of Greenpeace, Patrick Moore, has emerged as a doubter of the veracity of climate change. "There is no scientific proof that human emissions of carbon dioxide are the dominant cause of the minor warming of the Earth's atmosphere over the past 100 years. There is some correlation, but little evidence, to support a direct causal relationship between CO2 and global temperature through the millennia. The fact that we had both higher temperatures and an ice age at a time when CO2 emissions were 10 times higher than they are today fundamentally contradicts the certainty that human-caused CO2 emissions are the main cause of global warming," Moore told The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee last year.
The science regarding climate change is far from settled, despite Obama lecturing us that "the science tells us we have to do more".
Mankind has a big ego. He likes to imagine that he's created a huge problem so that he can go about solving it. How you solve a problem that doesn't exist is yet to be answered, but sane people didn't invent the phrase "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" for no reason. The atmosphere is not broken.
Here's what liberals won't admit. Entire careers and policy-making decisions revolve around a fantasy because it is all part of a $1.5 trillion industry. Whenever there's money to be made out of story in which facts are irrelevant, the liberals line up at the trough. Climate change has proven to be the story that has hoodwinked the most people.
Besides, are we really to trust the same people who tell us that Mike Brown was a "gentle giant" who was executed by officer Darren Wilson in cold blood? Even the Holder Department of Just-Us said that Officer Wilson shooting Brown was a case of legitimate self-defense. But the Black Lives Matter rabble refuses to acknowledge reality. Don't tell me for one moment that environmentally conscious hippies aren't part of these anti-police demonstrations whenever/wherever they occur.
With regard to climate change, Obama says, "There is no Plan B." I'm glad the President is so concerned with fighting an intangible bogeyman while the real world throws up real threats to our existence. A nuclear Iran, for instance? Don't worry, the mullahs are only interested in building infrastructure and looking after their people. They'll be on board once they see how great fighting climate change is.
There is not even a Plan A when it comes to ISIS raping, destroying and beheading their merry way across the Middle East. But, that's only in Syria and Iraq, dude. It won't be coming to a community near you, despite wide-open borders. We know that because moonbat liberals say so. So just play with your (energy-consuming) gadgets, sip your frappuccinos and be happy. The real world can't get us in Starbucks.