Obama's globalist vision dying a long death as 2017 looms

As 2016 is on its way out the door, Obama continues his combination of horrible policies combined with slick indoctrination. In an interview with his former chief strategist and political mafioso David Axlerod, Barry O. stated:

I am confident in this [globalist] vision, because I'm confident that if I had run again, and I articulated it, I think that I could have mobilized the majority of the American people to rally behind it. I know that in conversations that I've had with people around the country, even some people who disagreed with me, they would say the vision, the direction that you point towards is the right one.

Responding to this audacity, Michael Savage opined:

Yes, that's right. Flood America with useless immigrants who don't work. Increase the food stamp rolls by 10.7 million people, a 32 percent jump. Bring in Islamists who are not vetted. Really good job. One terrorist event after another. Oh yeah, we all want your vision. That's what we want, Mr. Obama. We want your vision, we all want to become Beirut or Lebanon itself, we can't wait to see internacine warfare in America. You're great. You turn blacks against the police. You did a super job, Obama.

I might add that Obama, in all of his puerileness and petulancy, is stirring up a new Cold War with Russia, as if we need that. We watched the Berlin Wall come down in 1989 so this big-eared man-child can try to resurrect it again, or something similar. A U.S.-Mexico border wall? Hell to the no. A wall between Europe and Russia all over again? Bring it on! What a marvelous, forward-thinking vision.
Luckily, Putin knows how to act like a grown adult and is not taking the bait that little boy Obama has spread out for him and is waiting until January 20 when a real adult once again takes the reins in the White House.
Also, I'm sure the folks whose 1,100 jobs were recently saved due to Donald Trump's intervention on their behalf really want to continue with Obama's vision which does nothing but reward global corporatists and whose direction is being engineered by the evil madman, George Soros. It really sucks for them that this "vision" was rejected.
I'll say this: If the majority of the American people can be rallied to this pile of stinking, rotting garbage, then the majority of the American people are in a drug haze, 24/7. And when drug problems are documented, these moron liberals want to ruin the doctor-patient relationship rather than crack down on the source of the life-wrecking substances—illegal aliens. That's right, aliens, I said it. There is only one type of immigrant: a legal one, someone who jumps through all the hoops, someone who would run around the block with their underwear on their head because the nation they want to be a part of told them it was required. That, dear reader, is an immigrant. Not someone who can't appreciate sacrifice because they didn't make any by sneaking in and who get rewarded by the powers-that-be just so they can increase their voting base. Those are people who—say it with me—don't belong. Very good, you're learning.
Speaking of aliens, let's not forget the the people of Nebraska, who I'm sure are just thrilled with Obama's vision, the one that just dumped 502 "migrants" in their breadbasket state. A vision that thinks there is a problem because their state is too white and too red.
The same media that told us that Donald Trump could never win and that he didn't stand a chance against the living blood clot known as Hillary Clinton, invented Leninist propaganda such as "hands up, don't shoot" and which kept showing pictures of Trayvon Martin at the age of 12, rather than the 17-year-old thug that he had become, warns us against the horrors of "fake news". What a joke.
Those who pay attention to Breitbart, The Drudge Report and Zero Hedge are, in the words of the brilliant Milo Yiannopoulos, "hateful, misogynistic, racist, anti-Semitic, sexist bigots," according to Lefties. But what they don't realize is that everything they accuse the "alt-right" of being is everything they are. It's opposite world with the liberals. It's just like when Democrats cite the working class; what they really mean is the non-working class.
Watch all the new-found free speech advocates, the same ones burning American flags in front of Trump Tower while the media report on how great and heroic they are, as they say nothing about S. 2493, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 that Obama signed, deep inside which was buried the "Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act," a bill straight out of 1984 in that it resembles Orwell's nightmarish Ministry of Truth. Germany, too, has proposed its own version so that it can cover up the considerable crimes and terrorist attacks of its Islamist migrants. According to Zero Hedge:

Long before the "fake news" meme became a daily topic of extensive conversation on such discredited mainstream portals as CNN and WaPo, H.R. 5181 would task the Secretary of State with coordinating the Secretary of Defense, the Director of National Intelligence, and the Broadcasting Board of Governors to "establish a Center for Information Analysis and Response," which will pinpoint sources of disinformation, analyze data, and—in true dystopic manner—'develop and disseminate' "fact-based narratives" to counter effrontery propaganda. 

In short, long before "fake news" became a major media topic, the US government was already planning its legally-backed crackdown on anything it would eventually label "fake news."

Does anyone care to tell me how this doesn't violate the freedom of speech and expression promised by the First Amendment? Where are all the chattering mouths of the media? Where are all the oh-so-concerned and frightened young people? They're all blabbering about fake news while the American government has officially informed them what is acceptable to report and that everything else is verboten. It doesn't matter, however, since they've been content to do just that for going on fifty years now. They're only too glad to have it confirmed so it can deprive the deplorables of anything approaching reality.
I suppose you could say that Obama's actually working for once, trying to cram an entire third term of damage into his last remaining month in power. Bums can really get a move-on when it's last dibs at the soup line.
I will be so happy when that clock strikes midnight this morning knowing that only twenty days of this insanity remains. Donald Trump is going to have a lot on his plate as if he didn't have enough already.
Happy New Year, and let this upcoming set of twelve months be the one in which America was truly made not just great, but tolerable again.

Lefties have lost all options as 2016 ends

Let me get this straight. First, it was the Electoral College's fault that Hillary Clinton lost the election. Even though the Electoral College was fine and dandy when it was thought that the "Blue Wall" would hold up, suddenly it is a huge oversight on the Founding Fathers' part and needs to be dismantled. We need the popular vote so that California and New York can decide our elections henceforth and forever more, say the liberals.
Then it was Russian hacking of our "democracy," (a.k.a. would-be oligarchy) although not a shred of evidence exists to confirm this and no-one is alleging this to the extent that CIA political hack head John Brennan is. Funny how the CIA was the bugaboo of the Left for decades and that their intelligence was always suspect, especially during the Iraq War—but now the agency's word is sacrosanct and we should be prepared to launch war against Putin posthaste.
It seems as though George W. Bush might be given a reprieve of sorts. These days, if anything goes wrong, it can be blamed on Putin. Global warming? Putin. The Christmas tree dried up too soon and all its needles fell off? A conspiracy by the Kremlin, quite obviously. Your toilet is backed up? Putin's responsible for that too. Your girlfriend left you not because you're an annoying, whiny hipster twat who wears goofy fucking glasses that do nothing to boost your non-existent intelligence factor. She defected to the Russian government at Putin's behest.
At the soiree she held for her donors, Clinton said, "We have to recognize that, as the latest report made clear, Vladimir Putin himself directed the covert cyber attacks against our electoral system, against our democracy." Ummm, we don't have to recognize anything from you, you friggin' sore-ass loser, go away already! The year 2016 has taken so many away from us, now adding George Michael to its list, but Hillary Clinton is still around. What's the deal, 2016? You finally removed Fidel Castro from this earth, no doubt one of your better acts. Now finish the job. And don't forget George Soros either. You only have four days left.
Since the Russian angle is going nowhere in a hurry, it's back to castigating FBI head James Comey, even though Comey has let Hillary Clinton off the hook twice, citing a lack of evidence of "intent," even though that was never part of the statute. You see, his recommendation to Congress that the investigation into her malfeasance be re-opened as a result of the discoveries made on Anthony Weiner's laptop assisted in her losing the election because, oh gee, it made her look untrustworthy. If any member of the American electorate did not already regard Madame Mao this way by the time Comey sent his now-infamous letter, that says more about them than anything Comey has ever done. Isn't it odd how Comey declaring Mrs. Clinton innocent yet again before the election had no impact with regard to her perceived irresponsibility and treachery?
And if all else fails, just blame the racism of the deplorables who voted for Donald Trump. Clinton regards herself as perfect, therefore so should 100 percent of the American people. If you voted for Trump, you're a white nationalist, a "bitter clinger," which I'm sure comes as a huge shock to the 35 percent of Hispanics and 12 percent of blacks who voted for Mr. Trump.
It is true that white America, especially its rural counterpart, voted for Trump enthusiastically, but does any Leftie idiot—if that's not a redundant phrase—want to give me a reason why white people in the heartland and the Rust Belt and in states like Idaho which are being flooded with "Syrian" jihadists migrants could cast their votes for Hillary and the Democrats? There are still enough whites in America who haven't been completely poisoned by left-wing union-controlled public schools, out-of-control Government, a complicit media and Marxist college professors yet. They still had enough faith in their families and communities to try to reverse the damage before it was too late. That's really deplorable of them, right? They've only been told about 2,956,743 times (and counting) since the start of the election process in spring 2015 that they have privilege that no-one else in the country has, that refusing to give up their God-given right to self-defense is the reason why the San Bernadino and Orlando massacres happened, and that they're responsible for why the country is so oppressive and unfair. And yet it's a complete mystery to the Clinton campaign why it lost.
MTV, an irrelevant cable channel if ever there was one, can produce a piece entitled "2017 Resolutions for White Guys," in which honkies and crackers are told that "black lives just matter" and that All Lives Matter is not the opposite of that. They are told to stop using the word "woke" as an adjective (yep, me neither), to stop something called "mansplaining" and that if they happen to be judges, to cease allowing rapists on college campuses to go free. Way to give cover to Rolling Stone's blatant lies, MTV.
Yet, in the brilliant words of black conservative, Crystal Wright, "Would we ever see a New Year's resolution produced by MTV telling black men to stop killing each other in inner cities like Chicago, stop impregnating black women to the tune of over 70 percent, marry black women. Will we ever see a video like that from MTV? No, because you know why? Because that would be racist." Somebody please inform Crystal Wright that she is obviously a white supremacist.
And there's our heroic, supposed President, sticking it to America and Israel on his way out the door, as we all knew he would. He obviously took his pen and his phone to his Hawaii headquarters. First, he scrapped the National Security Entrance-Exit system, a 2002 program that enjoyed both Democrat and Republican support that increased the screening of travelers from specific countries. Trump can likely revive the program once in office, but the United States will fly totally blind for the next month, as undesirables continue to pour into the country between now and January 20, 2017. If a terrorist incident occurs, therefore, the Democratic party machine and the media can blame Trump's "rhetoric".
Next, Obama invoked the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, a 1953 law protecting defined land areas from oil and gas drilling. Once invoked, it cannot be repealed by the next President, although the courts may step in to throw Obama's decision out or Congress can amend the provision. The Obama Administration crowed that, having invoked the drilling law, in coöperation with Trudeau's Canada, it would be "decades" before drilling could be an issue again. This was clearly a gift to the whackjob environmentalist Democratic donors and a way to scupper Trump's promises to make America more self-reliant on energy needs.
Thirdly, Obama opined to National Public Radio that Donald Trump should not seek to rule by Executive Order, but go through Congress to get what he wants. Technically, Obama is right about this, this is the way things should be done. But this is just more astonishing hypocrisy from Obama and his declaration that "my strong preference has always been to legislate when I can get legislation done" is a naked lie. Plus, it's not so much the number of executive orders—in Obama's case, it's 260—it's the nature of them, and Obama's ERs have been especially damaging and retrograde. This can be seen to blow a whistle and put the spotlight on Trump given past criticisms of Obama's executive orders. The problem is, it might take executive orders on Trump's part to undue the considerable damage done.
Finally, Obama sponsored a U.N. resolution that harshly criticizes Israeli settlements on Palestinian lands, which is ridiculous as these are lands won by Israel in 1967 and therefore not Palestinian land. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has accused Obama of crafting and submitting the resolution to the U.N. to undermine his leadership and Israel's borders. So much for the peaceful transfer of power.
Furthermore, Obama has done all of this while supposedly on vacation. This man and his family have spent $85 million of our money on trips, yet he has the audacity to assert that he can finally have a real vacation once he—thank you, God—leaves the Oval Office.
By the way, what is up with the friendship bracelets between Obama and Joe Biden? Does it get any more disturbing than this? It's great that a President and his veep get along so well. But, friendship bracelets with flowers and smiley-faces?! Vladimir Putin was supposedly close with ambassador Andrey Karlov, shot by a jihadist in Ankara a week ago. I doubt they had friendship bracelets, though. John Kerry's pink girly bicycle. Obama's knee pads. And now friendship bracelets. It's no wonder Russia, China, Iran and the rest of the world laughs at the United States and does as it likes.
On the bright side, the electors have done their job, despite all the crybaby sob-stories and death threats from frightened little progressives. Even despite that scholarly video released by Hollywood luminaries who urge the electors to "act like Hamilton," despite the fact that the actual Alexander Hamilton would have run a mile from these lunatics. Suddenly the Federalist Papers and the Constitution mean something to these subversive Commie airheads.
Donald Trump will, after all the crap that has gone down since the morning of November 9, be President of the United States. Notwithstanding the efforts of the self-styled hero Chris Suprun, for whom no such heroic accounts exist, and the Christian fundamentalist headcase, Art Sisneros. Go suck a hotrod's tailpipe with the engine running, fellas. It's all you're good for.
Meanwhile, earlier this month, in Britain, Prime Minister Theresa May won a resounding vote in the House of Commons regarding her timeline for invoking Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, officially triggering Brexit. As it stands, Brexit will be launched by the end of March 2017. After the demands for a second referendum and the High Court challenge by Remoaners, no less.
What next, Lefties? What next? All you do is lose. Keep it up. Oh wait, you can't. There's nothing left for you to do or to try. It's been fun, snowflakes, but now the voice of the people, in Britain and in America, is going to be honored. If it's really that tough to take, I'm sure there's a bridge somewhere in your vicinity to help ease the pain. Use it.

Secretary of State Rex: Steady at the till ... er, son?

It looks as if Rex Tillerson is President-elect Trump's pick for the position of Secretary of State. I've heard some things about Mr. Tillerson, the CEO of ExxonMobil since 2006, as have you, dear reader. Tillerson is also the 33rd President of the Boy Scouts of America and endorsed the inclusion of homosexuals as scout masters. I prefer to concentrate on the fact that Tillerson's involvement with the Boy Scouts demonstrates a desire to craft young boys into responsible men, give them some focus and some male mentoring in an increasingly fatherless societal environment and an understanding of the value of the environment.
Tillerson has also backed the Trans-Pacific Partnership and other free trade agreements, the Common Core national education experiment, and, as Exxon's chief executive, a carbon tax and the Paris Climate Accords. In essence, Tillerson maintains a trendy stance on social issues and has globalist leanings and sympathies, and that's disappointing.
The Exxon chief wasn't the most qualified for this position and has rattled some conservatives as too establishment and who would have been at home in a Jeb Bush administration.
The Secretary of State, however, does not set national policy. Tillerson was chosen because he, like the President he will answer to, is an outsider and a very successful businessman. Tillerson was also chosen, I highly believe, because he understands Russia and its president, Vladimir Putin. Tillerson has known Putin for 25 years and it is essential that the United States thaws out its relationship to this nuclear-armed and resurgent superpower. Tillerson could be crucial in keeping Russia onside as we attempt to dismantle the Iran deal.
I do not care one iota if Russia had in any way hacked the recent election, especially since I don't believe for one moment that it did, as the CIA now alleges. As far as whackjob conspiracy theories go, 9/11 being an inside job and the moon landings having been faked have far more credibility than this. See, the CIA has been poisoned with a useless political hack named John Brennan, courtesy of Obama who has used his reverse Midas touch—as in everything he touches turns to shite—to turn it into just another disruptive government agency that pushes climate change as America's and the world's top-most priority. Just take the "Intelligence" bit out of the CIA and that's what it currently is. Therefore, I place absolutely no stock in it.
Even James Comey's FBI has said no proof exists of any direct Russian influence in the election and the same liberal talking-heads obsessing over it aren't keen to provide the proof either. It's not hard to see why. It doesn't exist.
This Russia-bashing won't end until Trump takes office on January 20—it's just more garbage that we have to put up with from the Left in their pathetic attempt to certify Hillary because Madame Mao was just so damn perfect in every conceivable way that she couldn't possibly have lost an election.
First it was the argument that only the popular vote is legitimate and we needed to ditch the Electoral College, even though the Electoral College was fine when it was thought that the Democrats' "Blue Wall" would defeat Trump. Then it was the recount effort so Jill Stein could enrich herself from the donations of stupid suburbanite progressives. Electors have been deluged with correspondences, demanding they stop Trump and vote for Hillary. Now, golly gee, it's the Russians. How exactly the Russians helped to get Trump into office is, and I'm sure forever will be, unrevealed due to the aforementioned lack of evidence. What will these cretins try next?
As for the electors, one of them, a douchebag in Texas, has said he will not fulfill his role as an Electoral College member by voting for Trump. Would Chris Suprun, who asserts that he feels he would be supporting a king by voting for Trump (after eight years of imperial rule by Barry, no less), have raised the same stink if the pantsuit had won Texas? That's right, I don't think so either.
Suprun's reticence combined with the resignation of Art Sisneros, who claimed that Trump as President didn't fulfill some Biblical prophecy or some such fanatical lunacy, makes me think that there's something very wrong in Texas and that the Lone Star State's legislature had better seriously consider passing a bill during Trump's first year in office that binds that state's electors to the Electoral College result.


  No, I'm not Glenn Beck, although I am just as much of a headcase. So, do you think these glasses make me look smart or even half-way respectable? Photo source: Twitter
Let's not forget that Stephen Chris Suprun, this horned rim spectacles-wearing moron subscribed to Ashley Madison using the same address as a dubious 9/11 charity while bankrupt and unemployed and married with three kids and used a PR firm run by the Alinskyite agitator Van Jones, according to an excellent expose by Zero Hedge. C'mon, admit it, dear reader—you knew that Suprun was no clean conservative. He has spoken of the possibility of voting for the Twerker, for Chrissakes. 
For someone to bitch this much about Trump's Electoral College victory, while wrapping himself up in some completely bullshit narrative that Trump divides the country and rejects the "shining city on a hill" vision of America, points to some seriously insalubrious stuff about this twerp and his private life. I'm not exactly surprised. Disgusted, yes; surprised, no.
I cannot wait until December 19 when the electors finally confirm Donald J. Trump as President of the United States, and all these vile Lefties and Never Trump purist conservatives can no longer try to derail him.
Please don't talk to me about Rex Tillerson while madmen like Suprun and Sisneros are still at large in our society, while media giants like CNN still refuse to answer questions over Donna Brazile's leaked debate questions and other such dishonest actions against a gullible public, while the murder of a young Bernie Sanders supporter goes uninvestigated, and while the dispatching of a Supreme Court justice, who was found dead with a pillow over his head, whose bodily fluids were flushed away and whose demise was deemed not worthy of an autopsy, goes unexplained. 
Trump didn't promote backstabber Mitt Romney, an anti-Russia saber-rattler, or Bob Corker, the man who made the Iran nukes deal possible and favorite of the Republican Senatorial elite. In fact, I really hope that, twenty years from now, I can read in some Secret Service agent's memoirs that less than five minutes into their meeting, Trump slapped Corker across the face, laughed and said, "Get the fuck out of here, Bob."
Tillerson will promote a new and friendlier relationship with Russia which is exactly what is called for at this time in world history.
In other words, with Tillerson, we won't have that World War III that neoconservatives have been salivating over and about which Mr. Father-Knows-Best, Chris Suprun, would have nothing to say.

The Buckeye jihadist, and other various news sundries

Imagine you have a neighbor, dear reader, and he hates your car. He turns his nose up at you every time you depart or arrive while you're behind its wheel. He scowls at you from behind his fence whenever you wash it. One day your neighbor posts on Facebook, "Hate next door's car. It is a rustbucket piece of crap. It devalues the neighborhood just by sitting in the driveway. I am going to take care of it."
Then you wake up one morning to see the windshield smashed, tires slashed, fuel hoses cut and bodywork dented in. The Facebook post gets called to your attention and you take photos of the car and a snapshot of the social media post and file a police report in which you claim criminal property damage. Once the report is complete, the officer looks you in the eyes and says without a trace of irony, "We will follow up on this, but in all honesty, we cannot determine a specific crime here. We absolutely don't know your neighbor's motives, it's pretty much a mystery. And the end of the day, only he will truly know why he destroyed your car."
That is the essence of what Ohio Governor the Twerker John Kasich said of the car-and-machete attack at Ohio State University when he opined, "We may never totally find out why this person did what they did or why they snapped, we may never find out." Because we wouldn't want to make any assumptions about refugees or the Somali community or Islam, would we? It would defeat the whole narrative of the Dear Leader's "women and children" argument.
That certainly is what Ohio State President Michael Drake urged against when he said at a news conference, "We all know when things like this happen that there's a tendency sometimes for people to put people together and create other kinds of theories. We don't know anything that would link this to any community. We certainly don't have any evidence that would say that's the case." Therefore, strictly speaking, everyone chill out, support each other—presumably by telling each other lies that this had nothing to do with the Religion of Pieces—and let the investigation carry forward, the conclusion of which will be undetermined and one from which we certainly will not learn anything because we never do.
In the aftermath of the attack in which the legal resident jihadist put eleven in hospital by running his car at students, hitting some, and then stabbing others, a staffer at the Ohio State University Office of Residents' Life, Stephanie Clemons Thompson wrote, "Abdul Razak Ali Artan was a Buckeye, a member of our family. If you think it is okay to celebrate his death and/or share a photo of his dead body, and I see it in my timeline, then I will unfriend you. I pray you find compassion for his life." As Howie Carr said, parsing this insane screed, "In other words, if you're cheering the fact that this guy was killed before he was able to kill you, you must be a bad person, you are an Islamophobe!"
Clemons Thompson also included the hashtags for Black Lives Matter (Only When White People Are Involved) and some dumb "civil rights" BS called SayHisName. Stay safe, Buckeyes. Run, hide, fight! And just know that this will easily happen again someday because American universities believe in being sanctuary campuses and places where students are not allowed to defend themselves. Clemons Thompson, once students began calling for her head, deleted the post and begged friends not to share the post, all too aware that it was controversial. Cowardly as always, that's the Left.
Another thing, don't you love how these liberals toss the word pray around as if it actually means anything to them? They're the same people who think creation can exist without a creator, but they're going to pray for us. Golly gee, that's wonderful. But I digress.
I have no faith that this "investigation" will consider the Buckeye jihadist's Facebook entreaty addressing us infidels "to stop interfering with other countries, especially the Muslim Ummah. By Allah, we will not let you sleep unless you give peace to the Muslims. You will not celebrate or enjoy any holiday." Artan also wrote that he couldn't "take any more" with regard to alleged human rights abuses of Muslims in Myanmar and worldwide and blamed the United States for participating in them. When the phone didn't ring, it was some concerned member of the Buckeye community placing a call to Columbus authorities.
Artan had also previously complained that OSU had not enough Muslim prayer rooms so that he could fulfill Allah's wish that he put his face in another man's rear end five times a day. In August, he was profiled in a university publication called "Humans of Ohio State." Well, there's a glaring error if ever there was one, but never mind. In this piece, Artan stated that "I'm a Muslim, it's not what the media portrays me to be." Really, Artan? You're a real scream. I meant, you were a real scream.
Seriously, is anyone crying for this piece of excrement? By which I mean to ask, anyone normal weeping for poor, misunderstood Abdul Ali WabbaWabbaDooDa? Anyone out there who thinks any Somalian refugee has done anything of value for America at all, except for Ayaan Hirsi Ali?
In Somalia, over 98 percent of women aged 15 to 49 are forced to undergo female genital mutilation. Much more often than not, it takes place at age 15 when the young women, God forbid, might start to enjoy sex. The more the Somalian community grows, the more this vile, barbaric operation is practiced. It has become an epidemic in the largest Somalian communities in the United States: Minneapolis, Minnesota and Columbus, Ohio. In fact, according to Refugee Resettlement Watch, data from March 2015 indicates that 25,000 or more women or girls are at risk of FGM not just in Minnesota, but also Washington, California, Texas, Virginia, Maryland, New Jersey and New York. In Ohio, as well as Illinois, Michigan, Florida, Georgia, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts, between 10,000 and 25,000 females potentially face this butchery.
Folks, we are going to have to keep living this nightmare until Donald Trump officially becomes President on January 20. The current so-called President won't say a word except perhaps that if he'd had a son, it would have looked like Artan the inbred. The media will continue the fiction that America has a duty to reflect and continue to welcome Muslim refugees. The Department of Justice will not lift a finger to ensure that incidents like this, which have become too numerous at this stage to count off the top of one's head anymore, are prevented. We will have to wait for a completely new transfer of people in charge before The Farooks, the Mateens, the Tsarnaevs and the Artans of this world are treated pro-actively by an FBI that doesn't have an incompetent stooge and political hack as its leader and sancturary cities and college campuses are bled dry of federal funding.
Maybe—maybe—then, the focus will be on protecting American citizens of all stripes and faiths rather than having to read about how much Muslims fear retribution in the wake of attacks that were allowed to happen and about which they so often have so little to say condemnation-wise.

Flag burning and free speech pablum

Donald Trump has caused a stir by suggesting a year in jail or even a loss of citizenship for those who burn the American flag. I think this goes too far. No American citizen should face prison time and/or a loss of their citizenship because they exercised what the Supreme Court said constitutes free speech. This of course applies to American flags that you purchase yourself and not one flying outside of or displayed within an edifice or park, public or private.
Mr. Trump is throwing it out there that there should be some kind of punishment for the ungrateful cretins that do burn the flag and I agree with that. Congress has the right to pass a law that recognizes the free speech part of flag-burning, but can also classify it under current hate-crime legislation, same as torching a rainbow flag. If law enforcement catches someone in the act of disgracing, defacing and destroying an American flag, there should be a $100 fine and 30 hours of mandatory service at a VA hospital. Let these pukes see men who sacrificed for their right to hate their country and perhaps they'll be shamed into loving it. Let's say the puke in question doesn't show up for his mandatory assignment looking after disabled veterans. Then the miscreant can be jailed, not for free speech but for defying a court order. The saucy little nobody should serve three months in jail and be told again to fulfill his duty. If he or she fails to do so a second time, it'll be six months in prison. And so on.
A depraved new "challenge" has resulted from Trump's proposition, one with the hashtag FlagBurningChallenge. "I'm so here for this #FlagBurningChallenge," one moron wrote on Twitter. Suddenly, everyone's a fucking free speech advocate. They said nothing when Loretta Lynch threatened punitive actions against those who dared to criticize Muslims in the wake of the San Bernadino massacre. They said nothing to defend Christian bakeries, florists and photographers brought down by militant gays for refusing to provide services to their weddings on the grounds of freedom of expression and of religion. They had nothing to say in support of conservative groups targeted by the IRS. When the Left was dictating the terms of free speech and expression, all was swell.
In the "olden days," there would be street justice for those who burned the flag. You would be pummeled and the police would let it happen, only interfering when they thought the protester had enough. That's how people learned that you don't screw around with national pride. Before the Supreme Court decision in 1989, nobody stopped to think, "Wait a minute, does this count as free speech?" There would be an ass-kicking and everyone concerned generally agreed that it was deserved.
However, in these days of hot chocolate and therapy dogs and free diaper changes and whatever the fuck else is being offered to these butt-hurt little buttercups, that's unlikely to happen again anytime soon. So there has to be another way to get the message through that, free speech or not, the flag is sacred and destroying one is an act—a repulsive one—and cannot be strictly or technically covered as speech or expression.

Fidel Castro: Good riddance

I believe with all my heart that (1) people who have their heads screwed on straight are rejoicing in the death of that murderous dictator, Fidel Castro and (2) that the Commie shitbag is in hell where he belongs and will be forevermore. Long after the Solar System has collapsed upon itself, he will still be in agony—and I couldn't be any happier about it. What's more, I hope he suffered immensely before expiring.
There is no forgiveness, ever, for the truly wicked, and Castro is right up there with the worst of them. It has been said that Castro killed more Cubans in three years than Adolf Hitler killed Germans in six years. Our fifth column journalists are gushing about Castro, calling him a revolutionary as if that term alone indicates benevolence, and positing that Batista was such a bad dictator that the Cuban people deserved Castro's magnificence. They don't realize, because they possess less intelligence than a styrofoam block, that Castro sent journalists, in addition to homosexuals, to forced labor camps where they perished due to "grimy, inhumane and tortorous conditions."
As is usual with the Left, they engage in chicanery and intellectual dishonesty with regard to Cuba's education and healthcare systems. The claim the former greatly increased literacy while the latter looked after the nation's health needs. Cuba's literacy may have increased but only because it was a great tool with which to brainwash and propagandize its population to accept the leadership's authoritarianism. The Cuban educational system was great for teaching the population their ABC's and not much else. As for Cuba's healthcare, it was excellent for members of the government elite and tourists, but the healthcare infrastructure for average Cubans was so weak that they had to bring their own medicine, sheets, iodine, toilet paper and other such things to the hospital with them and many of those items had to be purchased on the black market. After all, whenever Castro was ill, he insisted on doctors from Miami or even Spain. He wouldn't accept what he deemed adequate for the Cuban proletariat, just as Obama won't ever use the "services" provided by the healthcare act colloquially named after him.
The Cuban ex-pats in Miami celebrating the death of the brutal dictator they fled must see as a slap to the face all the accolades being posthumously granted to Castro, including from the White House. I would be furious to see the President and the mainstream media lionizing this bloody strongman to the extent that they are. It is such a shame.
Meanwhile, Obama can send someone to Cuba represent the United States at Castro's funeral, but not in my name. Not in the name of tens of millions of Americans. But, as always, this means nothing to the Dear Leader and his minions in the propaganda dissemination business.

Recount effort DOA! 

The effort to recount the votes in three states that were part of the failed Democratic "Blue Wall"—Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania—that was launched by Green Party candidate Jill Stein on behalf of Hillary Clinton and the Left and funded by evil billionaire George Soros has been nixed. The Pennsylvania Department of State has told Stein that she missed the deadline for a state recount. Wisconsin said it refuses to hand count every ballot as was requested. Michigan noted that it certified its election in favor of Trump. All three states have told Stein: "Go away."
Even an anchor on MSNBC, of all media places, asked Jill Stein, "So Dr. Stein, are you a crybaby or a loser?" The answer to which is yes on both, but Stein alleged, "Well, this is not about me. It's about the American people who emerged from this election as not happy campers. Eighty percent, according to a New York Times poll, were disgusted by the conduct of the election."
So the "conduct" was apparently all on Trump, is the message Stein is sending out here. Hillary would have been charm-school graduate perfect if not for the "mean and nasty" Donald Trump. What, if anything, has that got to do with the final count?
Hillary Clinton's own lawyers have admitted that there's no evidence of fraud on Trump's part, he won every state, even the "Blue Wall" ones, fair and square. As opposed to Clinton who won the popular vote on the strength of three million illegal alien votes and likely stole New Hampshire, Virginia and even Colorado. When you come down to it, this was about pushing recounts past the December 13 electoral deadline so that those three states could be denied to Trump. Not that it would have worked as the House of Representatives would then have the say, but this is what passes for rationale on the Left.
Lefties—at least of the suburbanite prosecco-consuming variety—were prepared to take out a second mortgage or hand over their children's trust funds to Stein as long as there was some hope whatsoever that the election result could be overturned. Truly, deeply, fantastically laughable stuff.
I think this was all an effort to give Hillary hope so she could stop drinking and self-medicating herself. According to certain sources, she is not taking this very well. Would a big, fat "who the hell cares" be too banal of me? Well, I never let anyone get slaughtered in Benghazi and then patronized one of the dead's mothers by suggesting that she was confused as a result of her grief. So, no, I don't feel that it is.
I cannot wait until January 20 when the Left cannot pull any more hair-brained shenanigans. Trump will be the legitimate president and there is nothing they can do about it anymore. If the election results didn't kill most of them off, hopefully the coverage of Trump being sworn in will.

The country needs to come together and heal— but will the Left ever allow it?

Universities and high schools nationwide have responded to the election of Donald Trump as America's 45th President by holding professor-organized class walkouts, cry-ins and therapy dog sessions and implementing programs to teach students that Mr. Trump is a racist and a sexist who won by appealing to racists and misogynists.
Way to go, Lefties! You know, perhaps if you'd only had even more time, as if this past election process wasn't painfully long enough, to call your opponent and his supporters every bad name in the book, you'd have gotten your beloved, shriveled-up old prune into the White House. But it doesn't matter. Just keep on with the hysterical name-calling for every single appointment to Trump's cabinet, why don't you.
To give you just a slice of the great liberal meltdown occurring everywhere, Sarah Silverman, who's apparently a comedienne, tweeted after the election: "For a lot of people, this is the Great Depression. But this time it's emotional and physical. Our bodies are breaking down with fear and rage." Glad to hear it, Sarah! Keep physically breaking down, just like the mad, murderous woman you wanted to install in the White House. Continue breaking down, precious snowflakes, I mean that most sincerely. You'll solve a lot of problems if you completely disintegrate from that fear and that rage.
Now then, Jeff Sessions should be of grave concern to black Americans, say the fifth columnists in charge of propaganda dissemination, if he becomes Attorney General because he once joked that the KKK is okay save for the fact that they smoked weed and once called a black prosecutor, an assistant U.S. attorney, "boy," which he has vigorously denied. The media won't tell you that a civil rights prosecutor, Barry Kowalski, who overheard the KKK joke said that he was confident that Sessions was only joking and that another civil rights lawyer, J. Gerald Hebert, said that Sessions was not a racist and he just has "a tendency sometimes just to say something".
Mike Flynn, Trump's pick for National Security Adviser, hates Muslims, say the cognoscenti, because he has a history of condemning radical Islam and militancy among Muslims. Mike Pompeo is unfit to be CIA director, say these ivory tower imbeciles, because he was a sharp critic of Hillary Clinton and a defender of waterboarding. How come these dopes never complain about Navy Seal recruits having to undergo waterboarding as part of their training? Isn't it odd that you never hear about that?
These are excellent picks, the very same types of nominations Cruz would have made, and conservatives ought to be very pleased and proud. For the Left, of course, it's the rebirth of the Third Reich.
The Democrats and the Left will say anything about anyone, no matter how ruinous the accusations against them, which are never accurate, which are based on pure hearsay, conjecture and pretexts, just to destroy opposition to their backward, throwback cause.
Milo Yiannopoulous put it best in his latest podcast episode (Episode Thirty-Three). Yiannopoulos, speaking of his experience of having been accused of white supremacy with, as he said, no basis behind that assertion whatsoever, observed:

I've always known that the American press were scumbags, but I'd never quite realized—I'd never quite grasped—just how low they would go to damage their enemies, when they had no real argument, when they had no facts, no reason, no logic. They just wanted to hurt somebody and get them out of public life at all costs, and didn't mind what they said. They didn't care what the consequences were or the fallout. 

Just imagine what kind of person just announces that somebody is a white supremacist or an anti-Semite, out of nowhere, with no thought for the person or the consequences in that person's life, what it might do to their relationship with their family, what it might do to their future. 

These charges tend to stick because normal people think to themselves, "nobody would just say that, would they? Surely nobody would dare—nobody would be so sociopathic and vindictive and spiteful and mean and amoral—to just pluck that stuff out of nowhere, and call somebody an anti-Semite or white supremacist because they don't like their political positions. Surely, nobody would do that?" And so reasonable people think, "well, there's no smoke without fire, he must have done something."

This just serves to prove that the fight has only just begun. There is to be no sitting on anyone's laurels because the pukes on the Left just never give up.

  The Left is never shy about revealing their true agenda Photo courtesy of Aaron M. Renn's The Urbanophile website
I am going to borrow heavily from the second hour of Edward Woodson's November 18 show because he brought up a lot of very good examples and keen points about them. Woodson kicked off the hour asking, "Do these Leftists not realize that elections have consequences? Oh yeah, that was Mr. Obama, didn't he say that elections have consequences and that, 'We won, get over it.' Right? I don't remember we freaking out so much about Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch."
Woodson then played a clip from a CNN broadcast in which Carol Costello reported on the allegations against Jeff Sessions, noting, "Many Americans are concerned about minorities at this time. In fact, interestingly enough, the attorney general Loretta Lynch just sent out a press release. She's talking about attacks on minorities across the country. She says among other alarming trends, this new report from the Justice Department shows a 67 percent increase in hate crimes committed against Muslim Americans. It also showed increases in the number of hate crimes committed against Jewish people, African-Americans and LGBT individuals. Overall, she says, the number of reported hate crimes increased 6 percent, a number that does not account for the many hate crimes that may go unreported out of shame or fear. So—sigh—for that reason, I think that some in America might be concerned about Jeff Sessions's comments even if they did take place thirty years ago".
My own thoughts on this nonsense:
(1) Sessions's comments were brought up thirty years ago, the comments themselves were supposedly uttered many years before 1986, the year of his Senate Judiciary Committee hearing for a U.S. District Judge position. The comments amounted to allegations, not proof, against Mr. Sessions and Sessions has denied them.
(2) Just how many times can you have the BS expression "hate crime" in one rambling so-called "news report"? As Gene Hunt once said on Life on Mars, "Hate crime? What, as opposed to one of those I-really-really-like-you sort of crimes?"
(3) According to police nationwide, very little to no such crimes have been reported. A Muslim woman who talked of having her rag hijab being knocked off by Trump supporters, admitted she fibbed about it. There are also numerous other examples of made-up outrages.
(4) As to any actual hate crimes or instances of racist graffiti being perpetrated against communities, Trump responded, "Stop it." Is Barry Obama or Hillary Clinton or Harry Reid or Chuck Schumer or Keith "X" Ellison telling rioters and looters—laughably called "protesters" by the suck-ass media—to knock off their violence? When the phone don't ring, you know it's Jake Tapper informing you that he's prepared to report on Democrat condemnation of these "protests".
(5) Costello implores us to consider "Muslim Americans". In the very next sentence she refers to "Jewish people". So, I can take from this that Muslims are Americans but Jews are not or cannot be. Got that, dear reader? Muslims are AMERICANS, but Jews are mere "people". Nice, eh? No agenda there, nope.
(6) Also, we have "African-Americans" but LGBT "individuals". Again, why not "gay, gender neutral and transsexual Americans"? And, Ms. Costello, you left the "Q" out of LGBTQ. How dare you forget that! In my best attempt to "think" like a liberal, I can only assume that you're prejudiced against the queer component of the LGBTQ community. Queer lives matter!
(7) It's funny, isn't it, that concern for minorities never involves lowering their taxes and bringing opportunities to their communities through business or educational incentives. All the Democrats can ever promise the black community, for instance, is an abortion clinic every ten blocks or so in their neighborhoods. Let's incentivize strong families, religious convictions, intensive studying and hard work for minority enclaves across America. Oh yeah, that's hate speech, I forgot.
(8) The report asserts that many crimes are not being related to authorities out of "shame or fear". Yet all we've heard and seen on TV, newspapers and social media is Black Lives Matter (Only When White People Are Involved) informing us they won't back down and Latinos with their machismo saying that they are not afraid of Donald Trump. So, where's the fear? The Left is more mobilized and determined than ever. They may be easily triggered snowflakes, but they put up a great front. So I have no idea where "fear" ever comes into it, despite the media constantly chatting about it.
Then there's Whoopie Goldberg, who said on The Pissy Feminist View:

Black people are not going anywhere, they are not going to be slaves anymore, so take that out'cha head. Muslims who are born here as Americans are not going anywhere. We're not going anywhere. I don't know why you don't get this part.

As Edward Woodson interjected in response to this, "Listen, Whoopie: We're not going anywhere either! The 'Deplorables' aren't going anywhere either—and guess what? We won."
Whoopie Goldberg went on to assert, "We're all being harassed" when Joy Behar brought that subject up. Harassment, right. Ask conservative groups targeted by the IRS about that. Ask Facebook or Twitter users who've been kicked off the social media sites for daring to post conservative thoughts or memes. Don't talk to me about being scared. Conservatives, Right-leaning libertarians, hard-working, good-natured, law-abiding folks nationwide of all colors and creeds, real Americans and not George Soros-controlled robots, have been scared, fearful, terrified for these past eight years from all the Constitution defying, government agency poisoning and massive surveillance operations launched which didn't prevent one terrorist atrocity but did violate the right to privacy of ordinary citizens.
Obama's not out of office yet; he could do anything. Pardon Hillary, pardon Huma Abedin, pardon "the Dreamers" (a.k.a. the spawn of illegal aliens), get us heavily involved in Syria with "boots on the ground." Who the F knows with Bozo Big-Ears? The nightmare for us isn't over yet, it's got another two months to go. Doubtless the far-Left douches will find some way of continuing to make life very difficult for normal people—y'know, those who don't have neck tattoos, eyebrow piercings, bullet holes in their ears and EBT cards—for as much as those two months are worth.
Woodson notes that, during Obama's first term, he had both the Senate and the House of Representatives. The FBI was in his back pocket, as was the CIA and the NSA. He made the attorney general picks and nominated Supreme Court justices. He controlled the Justice Department. How quickly, Woodson notes, liberals have forgotten this easily verifiable fact which itself was the consequence of an election. Woodson says of these Lefties, "They are the worst kind of crybaby losers I've ever seen in my life."
Woodson then cuts to a CNN debate hosted by Brooke Baldwin in which Angela Ray debated Trump supporter Steve Cortez, during which Ray spoke of "undocumented" people, that the popular vote is the one that matters, not the Electoral College result, and that the Constitution is a living document. This is the transcript as it aired on Woodson's show.
Cortez: I don't want to relitigate the election. That was largely about the very issue you mentioned, which is illegal immigration, and the people of the United States sided with Donald Trump and with Senator Sessions. I say this as a Latino. And, they decided ...
Ray: Look at the popular vote.
Cortez: No, we don't have a popular vote here. We're a Republic and we have an Electoral College.
Ray: Oh, so okay, we don't have a popular vote?
Cortez: Well, read the Constitution. They decided, via our Electoral College by the way, that the victims are not the illegal aliens, the victims are legal immigrants and Americans. We already decided that as a country and they have a mandate to continue forward ...
Ray: They're people, Steve, and we didn't ...
Cortez: Yes, we did. We won. Are you saying we didn't win?
Ray: No, what I'm saying is that you did not win the popular vote and I don't subscribe to the term 'illegal alien'.
Cortez: Because we don't run for the popular vote.
Ray: 'Undocumented people...'
Cortez: We don't try to win the popular vote. We won the electoral vote and that's how we choose a president.
Ray: OK, congratulations. Nevertheless ...
Cortez: No, you don't congratulate me, congratulate the Constitution. That's our system.
Ray: Steve, the point is ... there's a whole argument that's existed for centuries about this strict Constitutional nature or strict constructionalist nature of the Constitution. We don't have time to go into that now, but there are people who believe that the Constitution is actually a living and breathing document, and sometimes it requires a change.
Cortez: Okay, well, we don't believe that. We just won based on those principles. But who cares what I believe, the American people voted us in based on those principles of strict constructionism, and I think that's going to be one of the reasons why Senator Sessions will be a great Attorney General. He's going to uphold the Bill of Rights, which has been under attack.
As Woodson observed, Cortez couldn't get away with saying 'illegal aliens' because "that's like the new n-word". I agree with Woodson in asserting that the Constitution "is dead, it's not living and breathing, it's dead". Because liberals and the Obama administration have killed it. Not that we can't bring it back to life though. And we have names for those people "who believe that the Constitution is actually a living and breathing document": They're morons, idiots, cretins, brainwashed rubes, douchebags and douchettes. That's who believes that the Constitution is "living and breathing" and shouldn't be interpreted via a "strict constructionist nature."
The Constitution is the best document that has ever been written by a fledgling government to ensure equality and liberty and it does not need to be constantly fiddled with, or else, what's the point in having it? Well, none, quite frankly, and that is exactly the goal of liberals: to be rid of it so that We the People have nothing to fall back on and their redistributionist tyranny cannot be overruled or overturned. The Left does not desire a "living and breathing" Constitution, they want it defunct, ripped to shreds, dead and buried forevermore. You stand a much greater chance at bottling unicorn or gryphon farts than you do meeting a Constitutionalist Leftie, the ultimate oxymoron.
And, I have to say: Where does Angela Ray get "centuries" of debate regarding constructionalism from? Decades, perhaps. Also, as has been pointed out already by many, if you remove all the dead people who voted, the multiple voting and the votes of illegal aliens, Trump would have won the popular vote in addition to the Electoral College. It's a fact, libtards, not that it means anything to you.
Let's end this entry with a quote from Dan Bongino, from his podcast episode, "The Left is Throwing a Temper-Tantrum while the Right is Winning Elections":

The Democrats, over the course of 2010 to where we are now in 2016, have been completely wiped out at the local level. That is because people on the Right that go out and protest do it respectfully, for instance, they left the Washington Mall cleaner than when they got there. There was no violence, nobody was getting beaten up, we didn't break any store windows, because we know how to install and make change through a movement. 

All you know how to do on the Left is whine and throw a temper-tantrum. Pay no mind to them. Don't let them influence your decision-making at all, because it doesn't matter. It's just a temper-tantrum. They're not voting, they're not going to register to vote, it is just a temper-tantrum for attention. It will have no meaningful effect on the electorate at all. 

We've already been through Occupy Wall Street, we've already been through Black Lives Matter, we've been through a number of these Democratic-sponsored, George Soros-type movements, and do you know what it's led to? A rout at every single level of government over the course of the last six years.

Hey, liberals, the ball's in your court in terms of how the country will heal and come together. It's up to you to decide how grown up you want to be about the election, the new President and how you regard your fellow countrymen going forward. Keep pulling character assassinations on us and those people who we embrace. You'll never win another election again.

Conservatives must answer the call to make America great again

You know it has to be pretty awful for the Democrats when the man the party stole the primaries from, and who couldn't leave the party fast enough to become an Independent again when Madame Mao lost, recently opined: "I come from the white working-class. And I'm deeply humiliated that the Democrat party cannot talk to the people where I came from."
This is a socialist speaking. He is, of course, Bernie Sanders.
Sanders has correctly identified the obvious problem for the Democratic party in that, under Barry Obama's risible leadership, the government, the media, the courts and the La-La Land of Academia has espoused and encompassed anti-white sentiment.
The desire to kill policemen—white policeman especially and in particular—and the demonization of white people as "bitter clingers," attached to fundamentalist Christianity (fundamentalist Islam would be just dandy) who want to enslave blacks, females and gay people and who knock the hijabs off Muslim women, didn't occur in a vacuum. All the campus discussions of white people having to recognize and check their "privilege" and the vicious beating of "crackers" by victimhood-embracing thugs nationwide did not happen spontaneously. That was organized.
A washed-up has-been of a pissant NFL quarterback decided to protest the nation that allowed a no-talent garbage can in a human form like him to make $19 million a year, and he dragged other malcontents in the league into the anti-police fray with him. This doesn't happen in a country that has not been turned upside down by a Community Disorganizer-in-Chief. 
It is hard to know whether or not this is the real B.H.O. or if he was merely a tool of the evil billionaire George Soros, who depends on a destabilized America so he can implement through its soul-selling politicians a Western Hemispheric bloc of completely open trade and open borders and who will get even more cash to stuff in his mattress when the dollar crashes. Certainly Obama has been a gentleman in his meeting with Trump. But the whole Jeremiah Wright story from nearly a decade ago is hard to ignore. This current president sat in the pews of a black power church listening to Wright scream, "God damn America!" And he did so for over twenty years. Let's just say Soros didn't have to twist the Dear Leader's arm in embracing this poison.
His rumpswab Van Jones, a self-avowed Communist and former White House Council on Environmental Quality lackey, can talk to the darling little snowflakes that they are their own gods and that they don't gotta listen to adults, yet none of these precious young minds could think to say in response, "Well, if that's true, get the hell off the stage and leave us alone, old man!"
Now this same man proposes that Donald Trump's presidential win represents a "whitelash." So, what exactly were the past eight years, Van? A "blacklash?" (HATE SPEECH! HATE SPEECH! HATE SPEECH!)
Mes amis, Hillary "Rotten" Clinton lost because she was the most corrupt candidate for the presidency ever. That barely living pantsuit made Warren Harding, Richard Nixon and Lyndon Baines Johnson look like choirboys. And what did Nixon do, when you get down to the very essence of it? He had underlings break into the Democratic National Party headquarters. I guess this was pretty bad for 1972. But do you know what Nixon did not do? He didn't sell state secrets or uranium reserves to prop up a slush fund of his. He didn't mishandle classified material. He didn't sweet talk some of the world's most repressive countries for cash donations. He didn't have his campaign chairman approach the FBI with a quid pro quo deal to declassify classified materials. And Nixon didn't leave US diplomats and officials twisting in the wind in a foreign land during a brutal, fatal attack and cover it up by saying, "Well, that's what you get when you release provocative videos!"
So, forgive me when I say to liberals, shut the hell up over Nixon already. Your candidate would have embarrassed the pond scum she is related to if only it was sentient.
The Democrats have proven, in recent days, to have not learned one thing from this election by proposing, through the likely Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, that Representative Keith Ellison become the new Democratic Party Committee chairman. Another Leftie with racial grievances and who will be the Council on American-Islamic Relations' best friend because he is, alas, a Muslim. Allow me to draw a parallel to the U.K.'s Labour party who proposed replacing one screwball, Jeremy Corbyn, with an even screwier one in the form of Owen Smith during the party's leadership contest earlier this year.
What Labour in Britain and the Democrats in America have to ask themselves is this: Where is the market for the far-Left? Oh, they stir things up so people can think of themselves as members of an aggrieved minority of some sort instead of individuals free to make up their own minds. Sure, they bring in migrants by the truckloads to offset the votes of the uneducated, hick inbreds—otherwise known as ordinary white people who work hard or wish they could be working hard save for the fact that there are no jobs for them.
Ah, just let the bums have their cider and their cannabis, eh? What do we care? They're just white folks, right? We have better things to do such as processing whole armies of young Muslim men across our borders because they're innocent little refugee lambs. We have to prepare for World War III because Russia hacks our elections and they must pay a price for bombing the radical Islamists in Aleppo. Hey, who said "radical Islamists"? You must be punished for that transgression. Don't trigger us!

Still, where is the majority for whom the far Left appeals? Marine Le Pen is presenting a serious challenge for the French presidency, Merkel's Chancellorship in Germany is threatened, the Northern League and the Five-Star Movement are growing in popularity in Italy. Viktor Orban in Hungary is influencing policy across Eastern Europe, Brexit was passed by voters in the U.K. and Trump is going to be President. Where's the mass market for the globalists and the socialists? 

For you Lefties, and you pseudo-conservatives who voted for Egg McMuffin or the pot-head, let's examine what allowed Donald Trump to ascend to the Oval Office on January 20 and see if you can comprehend it. At least try. Here we go: 

• People have children, and they worry about their futures.
• Common Core is destroying the education of their children.
• People of all age groups are facing a lack of jobs and very little opportunities open to them.
• The country has a debt of $20 trillion.
• The increasing presence of jihadists in the country coupled with the Ford Hood, San Bernadino, Orlando, Moore, OK and other attacks, means people can't go to the mall or any sort of public gathering without worrying about being killed.
• ISIS is rampaging across the Middle East and here in America, and illegal aliens are flooding the country.
• Congress is dysfunctional.
• The country is increasingly lawless, with riots in downtown streets all over the nation with little to nothing being done to control them.

On November 8, the electorate voted to put Donald Trump in the Presidency to fix these problems, many of which didn't exist before Obama's occupation of the White House.
I've said it before and I'll gladly say it again: Donald Trump is not perfect. He's a man. I have never exalted him to the status of a messiah as the Obamabots did for their guy and I won't. Listening to the Hillary supporters, the esteemed Mrs. Clinton never did any wrong, simply wanted to do good for the country and was being demonized and slandered because she was a woman. The Left loved "Saint" Hillary.
I have no expectations of Trump other than for the things I supported him for. Build that wall and let Border Control and ICE do their jobs to the full extent of the law. Crack down on riots and crime. Repeal and replace Obamacare. Protect the Constitution. Nominate solid conservatives to the Supreme Court. Rip up the Iran nuclear deal. Ramp up domestic energy production to the hilt and sign a deal with Canada for the Keystone Pipeline and tell the Saudis to eat camel poop. Institute an energy policy that does not revolve around the fantasy that is "Climate Change." Renegotiate NAFTA and reject TPP. And end all this asinine saber-rattling with Russia and work with Putin to decimate ISIS and turn Raqqa into a glass parking lot.
Come together, conservatives, and let's not let these Establishment types and especially the Left off the hook. It's payback time. This is no time for reconciliation with our enemies. I'm not saying curb-stomp them. Just put them in a position where they will be pot-bound. We can never—never—allow the country to hang from a thread like we did with this election.
Watch your elected representatives and hold them to account. Stop telling us that corporate-whore putzes like Paul Ryan are the future of conservatism. Stop idolizing the GOP and start holding their feet to the fire. Help this administration out through pure people power. If the Left can do it, so can we.
The nation needs you, conservatives. Are you going to answer the call?

'Never Trumpsters' need to be 'Never Hillary' on November 8

This is likely to be the last entry I write before what will be a truly historic U.S. election regardless of the way it goes. Conservatives, patriots and true libertarians can only hope that it breaks one way, and one way decisively.
Don't kid yourselves that you have a choice. You do not. It is Donald J. Trump or bust. If you doubt this, I don't know what can be done for you. Barry Obama has not been "just another Democrat". Hillary Clinton with absolute certainty is not. This is not a mere liberal-versus-conservative contest. It is much more than that. It is Stalin versus Roosevelt. Reagan versus Gorbachev. Chiang Ki Shek versus Mao Zedong.
Do not give me this argument that voting for Hillary is actually placing an "X" in the box next to her name. Ladies and gentleman, that has to be one of the most pusillanimous differences of opinion I have ever heard in my 46 (nearly 47) years of life. It's this simple: If you vote for the pot-head or the chrome dome, you will be taking votes away from Trump. By proxy, you will be voting for Hillary Clinton. Got that? Now, my little temper tantrum-throwing Never Trumpsters, let's examine what the expression "by proxy" means. One definition is the giving of authority to someone in place of another. If vote "B" takes away from vote "A," legitimacy will ultimately be conferred onto vote "C".
Do you think for one moment Madame "Stinky Retard" Mao will acknowledge the votes for Johnson or McMullen that helped her to get elected, if such a nightmare is meant to be? No, she and the Democrats will have a "mandate". You people cannot be this dim.
Trump is not a true conservative, many of you moan. Look, I admire your principles—but what good are those principles when they will be entirely defunct under the hag in the pantsuit's administration? If you identify as a conservative, whatever that means to you, if you identify as a Republican, even if it's of the garden-variety, feckless, cowardly type that thinks a government shutdown is the worst scenario to ever befall the country, even through there were eight of them during the Reagan administration. And, golly gee, all I ever hear is "Trump is no Reagan". Hillary will target you as well as those on the Trump bandwagon. You, dear voter, will be giving her way too much credit if you think she will not and that is bewildering to me.
Trump is a bully, I hear you belly-ache. Listen to me. Can he possibly be any worse than the "sorority girls and college boys" that Michael Savage refers to, the acolytes in the Obama government, who bullied their way through academia and lower-level government positions to get to where they are? People like senator Elizabeth Warren who claimed non-existent Native American heritage so she could rise above all the other white people who weren't as "clever" as she was and who carpetbagged from Oklahoma to Massachusetts, a state she knew oh-so-much about that she reckoned there was a coastline along the Western half of the state.
Do you really think Mr. Trump is more of a brow-beater, antagonizer and intimidator than the batshit-crazy feminists, the radical Islamists and the Jonathan Gruber-like nerds-from-hell that currently infest this land? Because under Hillary Clinton, they're not going anywhere! Do not tell me this is a straw-man argument. You know better than that. If you don't recognize that very basic, simple fact, then you have no business voting. In fact, you need to disappear for a little while to get your head straight.
Let's not BS each other. We all know what's at stake. We conservatives have had to swallow the likes of John McCain and Mitt Romney the past two elections. There would be no Trump if establishment Republicans even came close to acting like an opposition. We'd be so much better off under a John Kasich, a Lindsey Graham or the third Bush, what's-his-name? The one with the exclamation point—y'know, him. He's so inconsequential I've forgotten what's he's called. Doesn't matter, does it? None of these so-called men are coming to rescue you and your fabulous go-along-to-get-along Grand Old Party. Ted Cruz has honored the pledge and patched up differences with Trump. Erick Erickson has seen the light and, as such, deserves credit. Erickson wrote on September 21:

In short, I see the election of Hillary Clinton as the antithesis of all my values and ideas on what fosters sound civil society in this country. Further, she should be in jail. 

At least with Trump we might, might, get a better Supreme Court. We might get better cabinet picks. In fact, in terms of my view of the country the odds are pretty great that my side has a greater chance of prevailing with Trump than Clinton. What most would identify as my side would have control of the Executive Branch and the powers of appointment and regulation that come with it.

Folks, this was one of the most prominent "Never Trump" types who wrote this. And he's absolutely correct. Spot on, in fact. He will be holding his nose in voting for Trump, but this fine piece leaves me with no doubts that he will be.
C'mon, conservatives, get over Trump already. You're also voting for Mike Pence. If Trump does get himself tossed out of the executive branch for being the tyrant you fear he is—ensuring that Paul Ryan will step up to the plate in a way he has never done with Obama—then the Indiana governor will be the man in charge. But I just cannot get over the fact that we already have a Constitution-defying, authoritarian madman in charge and he's been defiling our nation steadily for eight years.
It's time that "Never Trump-ism" dies on November 8. You've expressed your purist rage, now drop it. This Tuesday, we have all gotta be "Never Hillary".