Bleeding hearts condemn Kurds for torturing ISIS "children"

It has been reported that soldiers of the Asayish, the Kurdistan Regional Government in northern Iraq, are accused of having beaten and tortured some children of ISIS, some of them as young as 11 years old. This was reported in several news sources, but I've chosen Yahoo! "News" because it is where I first read about it and because Yahoo! is risible 99.99 percent of the time. The report says:

At least 17 children—all but one of which are Sunni Arabs from former Isis-held territory in northern Iraq—have alleged abuse and torture at the hands of Kurdish security services after being rounded up at a refugee camp 40 kilometres south of the Kurdish capital of Erbil. 

They say that the Kurdistan regional Government (KRG) security forces—known as the Asayish—punched and kicked them, held them in stress positions and beat them with plastic pipes and cables. Nine of the young boys claimed to have been subjected to electric shocks. 

A 14-year-old boy told Human Rights Watch that he was threatened with rape unless he confessed to being affiliated with Isis, while two others said they had considered suicide because of their treatment by the Asayish.

Now we have the angle, ladies and gentlemen. We can definitively state the reason behind this news story. Human Rights Watch is involved. There you have it.
Like any normal person, who knows that ISIS brings its children up in an atmosphere of poisonous hatred from the day they are born, who knows that an 11-year-old in ISIS is a stone-hearted killer and nothing like 11-year-olds in the West, when you hear that the Kurds tortured these mini jihadists, you think, "Alright, good news for once!"
But alas, the liberal luvvies, the do-gooders, the Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch parasites—who have nothing to say when Christians and Yazidis in Iraq and Syria are being systematically wiped out and when Israelis minding their own business are blown up by Hamas missiles and who offer no words of condemnation when Germans and Swedes are raped and assaulted in their own countries by barbaric invaders—want to condemn the good guys in the Middle East, the Muslims that we should be embracing. I have no words for this level of stupidity, I really don't.
Human Rights Watch couldn't give a stuff when the British people suffered as a result of George Soros sinking their currency in 1992, when he caused the UK Treasury to lose £3.2 billion. This thoroughly evil man bets against currencies everywhere and funds subversive, violent groups across the world with his ill-gotten trading gains, but the Remainiacs, the anti-Trump lunatics, the global citizen types are just fine with that. I guess their claim to want to "stick it to the rich" is absolute bunk.
What is Human Rights Watch's position on the carnage of September 11, 2001? Does Amnesty International take a side regarding the death of innocent American Kate Steinle who was killed by a five-times-deported illegal alien in a place where she should have been safe? Does the International Crisis Group or the International Red Cross and Crescent by any chance care to pontificate on the horror of the Pulse nightclub slaughter in Orlando last summer? Inquiring minds would love to know.
What I do know is that these contemptible boobs want to declare the Kurds war criminals. Not Turkey who've spent their entire history as a distinct nation trying to eradicate them. I'm sure Human Rights Watch has a lot to say about Erdoğan's continuous assault on Turkey's secular constitution, right? Of course not, because sharia law is so liberating, especially for women and homosexuals.
These same Commies who want to push the Israelis into the sea so that "Palestine" can have its (terrorist) state would never entertain the idea for the formation of an officially legitimate, world-recognized Kurdistan.
Yahoo! "News" (as well as CNN, MSN, etc.) publish these stories, with the typical progressive/suicidal/self-loathing slant, in the hopes that many people will respond with "OMG, the Kurds are so horrible! So what if the children are from ISIS? Brutality is brutality!" This is what these clowns from Reuters and the Associated Press count on. They are the kinds of people like the reporters from the mainstream media who ask Donald Trump what he means by keeping America safe, because they are so remarkably thick-headed.
But the responses from most of the readers—who live in the real world—must come as deeply disappointing and disturbing to them.
Some assorted gems from the news story comments thread: 

• Some of the 'children' have been accused of beheading babies.
• Be careful Kurds, the Liberal lefties will start protesting and demonstrating against you and you know how torturous that can be.
• Are these the ones the media and lefties want Trump to let in?
• OK, so what is the point of this press release? Is it to sum up some sympathy for ISIS?
• What kind of world are we living in,when the do-gooders worry more about terrorists than our own people? The Kurds torturing those kids who would cut your throat as soon as look at you. Thanking the Kurds is more like it.
• Good, I hope they kicked the #$%$ out of them.
• To be perfectly blunt, I don't care, if there [sic] old enough to walk into a packed market with a suicide vest to wipe dozens of innocents, beating by comparison is nothing.
• Who is funding the goons of Human Rights Watch? It seems to me if you pick up a gun to play a man's game, then you have to be prepared to accept a man's punishment when caught!
• I have no issue with this.
• Oh no ... They are getting tough treatment ... Oh no, this cannot happen, the lefties will want to have them sent to Germany or Sweden to kill and rape there. Tough justice is all this cult will get as they have caused endless horror in the Middle East, all paid for by Saudi Arabia and Obama's covert arms and funding madness!
• Dreadful but good to hear it's out in the open. In the UK the mass rape of little girls by Muslim men has been kept under filthy political wraps by the socialist councils and media.
• What so-called "Human Rights Watch" would you report that 1000s of Kurdish Yazidi child girls as young as age 3 have become sex slaves by ISIS terrorists?
• Thank you Kurdish soldiers. Great job getting rid of this #$%$ by any means necessary.
• These ISIS kids would have no hesitation in putting a bullet in an innocent person's head so tough #$%$, stop crying out when the table is turned.
• These are NOT kids. They are soldiers. Soldiers that will kill men, at the drop of a hat.
• Don't take prisoners just shoot them, kill them and let the animals eat what's left and it's cheaper option for you, better than jailing them.

And the most salient point of all?

• Well, you reap what you sow.

President Trump's first week in office: Executive orders and other various sundries

We have a new President of the United States, dear reader. For the first time in eight long-ass years, we have one that will speak to us, not at us. A President who, much like Mr. Reagan 30 years ago, will talk because he genuinely wants to address the American public and not because he views it as a mere formality to be delivered devoid of emotion in a near-monotone. One who can go off-script and explain himself or his policies without the "uhhhhhh"s, "errrrrr"s and assorted squeaks and whistles that accompanied Obama at the podium.
Klunk from Dastardly and Muttley in their Flying Machines was an entirely competent speaker compared to Asshat the 44th. Hell, Muttley himself, with his "rassa-frassa-frassa," could deliver a more lucid argument than B. Hussein Obama ever could without TOTUS (Teleprompter of the United States).

  Muttley: Compared to Barry Hussein Obama, a polished speaker of renowned eloquence
Do you want to know how committed this allegedly mysogynistic Grand Wizard of the KKK President of ours is to America and its people? Get a load of the executive orders Trump has signed since taking office last week:
(1) He has fulfilled his promise to halt arrivals from hotbeds of Islamic terrorism by banning immigration from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. Saudi Arabia should have been included on that list, but what they hey, I'll gladly take it.
(2) He has sought to clamp down on "the unwarranted economic and regulatory burdens" of the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. Obamacare. This is the first step in dismantling the bureaucratic nightmare of Obamacare so that a more equitable and free market-based health care system can be hashed out by the Republican Congress.
(3) Trump has re-instituted the so-called Mexico City Policy which bans the U.S. from funding the global abortion industry, preventing non-governmental organizations from encouraging abortions. The policy is named after the location of a U.N. Conference on population in 1984 where President Ronald Reagan first announced the strategy.
(4) An order was signed to start rebuilding our military in the wake of all the plunder and neglect it suffered under the Obama administration.
(5) Mr. Trump signed an executive order which put a freeze on governmental regulations until they can be fully read and researched—and rejected if they do nothing to advance energy independence, business or job creation. Another executive order was signed freezing the federal workforce. Both were long overdue.
(6) At long last, the Keystone/Dakota Access pipeline has been approved. Another milestone on the road to American energy self-sufficiency.
(7) Trump has withdrawn the U.S. from the Trans Pacific Partnership, which was designed to be the Asian/Pacific Rim equivalent of the European Union. Also, the North American Free Trade Agreement will be renegotiated, if the Mexicans don't withdraw from that. More on that in a bit.
(8) Trump has cut federal funding to sanctuary cities across the country. Another measure that is long overdue. If the mayors of these cities will not follow the law, then Trump is absolutely right to break them by refusing government funding for their cities. The policy is working. Already, Miami has capitulated.
(9) Last but certainly far from least, "the Wall" is being built and, with Trump in charge of the project, the whole thing will be done in three months with no sacrifices in quality.
Mexico says it will leave NAFTA if work on the Wall doesn't cease and the policy is not immediately reversed. That's supposed to be a threat? Hey, Mexico, you made a $60 billion trade surplus from NAFTA over the past seven years, but you refuse to stump $15 billion for the Wall, which will stop Central Americans from flooding your country because they won't be steaming northward anymore? Good, we don't need your narco-state mooching off America's generosity anymore. Don't let the door hit you where the good Lord split you, amigos. We'll trade L.L. Bean flannel shirts with the hockey-heads to the north of us instead and we'll be just dandy.
Mexico says that the construction of the Wall is an assault upon its dignity. That's odd, because I didn't think it had any considering it is a one-party oligarchy whose presidents, including the current Enrique Peña Nieto, are controlled by the nation's drug cartels, and won't even allow its citizens to possess equalizers. How dignified of you, Mexico.
This country has, since NAFTA was signed 24 years ago, become an exporting powerhouse. It exports practically everything. Factories left the American Rust Belt to reöpen in Mexico, sometimes just a measly ten miles south of the border. Its exports are worth $400 billion per year. Yes, I'll say that again: Mexico's exports are currently worth 400 billion dollars a year, with 80 percent of those exports going to the U.S., tariff-free. And Mexico wants to throw that all away because of an assault on its "dignity"? Talk about unhinged. Go ahead, Mexico. Honestly. Make the gringo's day.
Now then, no true conservative wants a President to operate with just a pen and a phone. It is because Obama ran his occupation of the White House this way which merited a similar response from the new President, to reverse some of the damage. I'm in no mood to attempt to pursue any of these things through Congress only for McConnell and Ryan to stall their progress and pontificate to the oh-so-unbiased media from the high moral ground that they think they have, and I'm not alone. Screw Congress. Get some major, policy-shifting stuff enacted now and let's see if Congress doesn't eventually get dragged into the nationalist zeitgeist. Sometimes you have to fight fire with fire and, with these numerous executive orders, this is just what Mr. Trump is doing.
Make no mistake about it, this is excellent work by the new Prez and it demonstrates that he is standing by his campaign promises and acting on the issues that allowed him to connect with the electorate.
Although too much power in the hands of any President is a negative, especially as the Constitution does not allow for it, Trump's first week has seen him sign executive orders that are absolutely conservative, not "populist". They are conservative because they address the nation's economic health, its security and its respect for life as well as its robust rejection of globalism.
If you "purists"—you Glenn Beck, Bill Kristol and George Will types—refuse to give credit where it is due, if you cannot rise above your petulant jealousy of this man's wealth and the fact that he was more famous thirty years ago than you can ever hope to be, then I can't help you. You are clearly in league of your own—one that, rest assured, I'll never be seeking to join.
Meanwhile, President Trump has also launched an investigation into voter fraud. For those of you who think he is needlessly bringing up the election again, keep in mind that it was not he that started this. The media, in all its perversity, insisted on spreading the narrative that Mr. Trump's presidency is illegitimate and that he did not win the popular vote. I personally believe that I have heard the expression "the popular vote" more times in the past three months than I had in the forty-six years of my life which preceded them.
We know that the Democratic party machine brings in illegals to vote. In New Hampshire, for instance, they got bused into the polling places in Manchester and Nashua, entire hotels full of them. They all voted for Madame Hillary. The pantsuit stole New Hampshire, she stole Virginia and she possibly stole Colorado as well. Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta opined, in one of those now infamous e-mails of his, that it was fine for illegals to vote with driver's licenses. If we had media in this country with any integrity, this would be brought up. But as we absolutely do not, we have to go with what we know.
And what we know, courtesy of a study conducted by Professor Jesse Richman from Norfolk, Virginia's Old Dominion University, is that over 800,000 non-citizens voted for Hillary Clinton on November 8. Of the estimated 20 million illegals in the United States, Richman discovered 6.4 percent of them cast their votes for the Democrats, a number that equals 834,381. These are only those who were willing to admit it. And we're supposed to believe that Trump is wrong when he said 2 million illegal alien votes granted Clinton the popular vote? Give me a break.
In the brilliant words of Dan Bongino, who filled in for Mark Levin this Friday, "A survey was taken, and we all know that when it's a liberal survey that advances a liberal narrative, 'it's gold, brother. Just rock'n'roll with it, man. It's a liberal talking-point, of course the survey's real.' ... But what about when you ask people if they voted and they say yes and they weren't supposed to? 'No, no! No! Not that survey! Not that! There's no voter fraud. I can prove it! How? I don't know, I'm a liberal. I said it, and the media will say it, so it's gotta be real. It was on CNN, so it's definitely true. I saw it on MSNBC, that means that it actually happened, c'mon.' Oh, OK, yeah, that sounds legit."
Since the Democrats and their media lapdogs won't try to prove to us that this many illegal aliens didn't vote, we must pursue the proof that they did. Trump is on the case and, ladies and gentlemen, these law-breakers and frauds in the Democratic party will get exposed. I fully support this investigation.
Finally, I have to say, it's amazing just how hateful the Democrats continue to be in the wake of Trump's election victory and inauguration. Bad enough they would consider a racist/anti-Semite like Keith Ellison, every bit a radical community disorganiser as Obama, for chair of the Democratic National Committee. Now we have a Caucasian woman from Idaho running for the role named Sally Boynton Brown.
If you want to talk about the sick obsession with race that these unfortunates have, listen to Brown. At a Washington D.C. meeting of the seven candidates vying for control of the DNC, Brown told all those assembled:

My job is to listen and be a voice and my job is to shut other white people down when they want to interrupt. My job is to shut other white people down when they want to say, "Oh no I'm not prejudiced I'm a Democrat, I'm accepting." My job is to make sure that they get that they have privilege and until we shut our mouths and we listen to those people who don't, we're not going to break through this.

Brown also implored the audience of malcontents to consider the fact that "we are so white" in Idaho. Great. Bravo. That's some really keen political insight there. I'm still trying to figure out what the problem is, though I'm guessing it has something to do with the fact that Boise and Twin Falls haven't been totally taken over by young Afghan and Somali men yet.
Sally Boynton Brown has since reported that, in the wake of her vile observations at the DNC candidate conference, that her family has been threatened. Alright, well, I'm going to go ahead and say that this woman can't possibly love her family too much anyway to have said things that are so contemptuous of their race. What does it say that she wants a job so badly that she has to sound even more loathing of white people than Ellison or Black Lives Matter (Only When White People are Involved) in order to try and secure it? If I was any son of hers, I'd run far away from home, only after leaving a note behind reading, "Dear Mom, sorry I'm a white boy. I have gone to Africa in an attempt to figure out how the black race is so much better and superior to mine. Goodbye."
What kind of pathetic, milquetoast of a man would be married to this shrew? Honest to God, don't tell me this woman isn't fantasizing about somebody else or somebody else's, if you get my drift, every time they hit the sack. Kind of ironic that her last name is Brown. Just thinkin' out loud here, folks.
Disgusting beyond belief. Sally Boynton Brown, you and your type are the real deplorables in this country. But hey, good luck on becoming DNC chairwoman. It'll ensure a conservative-nationalist in the White House for quite some time to come.
And on that note, mes amis, if you're going to tell me that I am obligated to learn lessons about respect for the gentler sex from women wearing hats that look like vaginas and cheering a genuine mental case who couldn't stop mentioning the p-word and how that is integral to women's success, then I say in all sincerity: Get on your knees and blow me! Or grow up. Let the record show that I'll eagerly accept either.

Fake news is alive and well in the waning days of Obama's occupation of the White House

I want to see if I've got this right, dear reader. The torture of some worthless raghead jihadists in Abu Ghraib was in the headlines everywhere as the most evil thing that the U.S. military had done since the Tet Offensive or assisting Britain in bombing the bejesus out of Dresden. Just awful, soul-sapping stuff, y'know? We Americans could never live that one down. We know this was a massive human rights fiasco because the usual suspects who judge such things—the Red Cross, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International—told us so.
The torture of a young mentally disabled white man by four mindless thugs appeared in the news on a fractional basis only and the media was desperately trying to cover it up and put their typical spin on it. And when I say "typical spin," you know that it is as far removed from unbiased journalistic integrity as you can get, right? Does Amnesty International have any comment on this? I thought not.
Anyhoo, some hack called Don Lemon opined on air that he didn't consider what the four yout's put the disabled chap through to be evil. It was just "bad home training," don't you know. As if they're wayward puppies, though I do have to say that I'm surprised their crackhead mothers—let's not even pretend they had stay-at-home fathers—took the time to toilet train them. To Lemon's point, that's probably the best home training they had ever received. Oops, there I go being judgmental again. How dare I?
First of all, why we even stop to regard these anchors and reporters or whatever they're supposed to be with as much time and consideration as we do is beyond me. I could never give a stuff about Don Lemon. I know that being both gay and black is a huge plus in the media and therefore an instant elevator to having you narrate the goings-on of the latest riot that the "news" corporation you work for helped to foment. I'm not big on identity politics though, so again, give me a reason to care about his tequila-swilling ass, please.
On New Year's Eve, Lemon was live on the air, supposedly working for his unproportionate fame, and he was telling the Clinton News Network viewers—and shame on them, incidentally, for providing the ratings—between hiccups that he might be in a relationship again and he's going to have some personal new year's resolutions and blah-de-blah. Don Lemon—or should we refer to you as "Don Lime" henceforth, as Texas talk-show host Chris Salcedo suggests?—let me be frank: You could walk off a cliff tomorrow and the only way I'd know about it is because talk-show hosts would be citing it as if it meant anything to we the listeners' lives. Honestly, I would not care one iota.

  I'm Don Lemon. I'm a superstar because I'm gay and black and am oh-so-concerned about "fake news"

It's the same deal with Kelly Megyn. Or Megyn Kelly. Which is it? Damned if I know. The bint is "Me-Again Kelly," as far as I'm concerned. Again, I have no idea why I'm expected to care about her to any measurable degree—which, rest assured, I do not—but surely her true colors have come out now? She was a conservative to advance her career at FOX. Roger Ailes wanted her to flick her hair and pout for the camera and she did like the good little filly that she is.

Once Kelly started letting her own mind, inasmuch as she possesses one, take over, it is obvious where she stood: Pro-Hillary Clinton and anti-"deplorables". She could have no further career at FOX, the presence of Shepard Smith be damned. The moment she called the hacks at NBC News, her new home, "journalists" and said she had great respect for them, I knew I had the ultimate confirmation of her Leftie credentials that I'd been fuming about for a year to date. Yet there are still some people that will remain loyal observers and follow her tail anywhere. Well, if they want to waste their lives like that, let them. Just goes to show the hypnotic power of good female legs for men and some nebulous embrace of girl-power for women, I guess. 

  Megyn Kelly's legs have great respect for the "journalists" at NBC. Or would that be the other way around?

One of the more troubling aspects of British life, that has now started to trickle down into American life, is the building up of people only to tear them down later. It's like a bloodless form of throwing miscreants to the lions, the sporting event that so delighted the Roman citizenry. It used to be that you'd say it reflects badly on the Brits because their misplaced affection for socialism meant that they had no respect for success outside of government. That is still true to a certain extent—and no wonder that trend has taken off in Obama-nation.

However, I'm beginning to realize that there is an upside to it. We build up people, who have no business being celebrities in the first place, and we tear them down when they overstep the line. Like Lily Allen and Gary Lineker, here in Britain, who think that just because they're household names that they can lecture the British people about our responsibility to those precious migrants pouring into Europe—you know, those hordes of stout-hearted young men who burn churches and shout "allahu akbar" while looking for women to sexually harass and accost? I do feel that a slapdown, which is what so many of these entertainers, be they singers, musicians, actors or newspeople deserve, is entirely merited.

How am I to have any faith in these people when they cluck about "fake news," but present "hands up, don't shoot" as if it actually happened? When they told us that Hillary Clinton was up by twelve points with a month left to go before the election and there was no way Donald Trump could win? When they routinely sweep stories that defy their childish narrative of "it's not fair" under the rug and willingly embrace the creation of a Ministry of Truth so that anyone who dares not to be a moonbat can be silenced and prosecuted for challenging the portrait painted by the powers-that-be? First Amendment? LOL, what First Amendment?

This media covered every single instance of made-up "hate crimes" committed by people who, golly gee, just happened to be obvious Trump supporters. And have we got an apology from Don Lemon or Wolf Blitzer or Jake Tapper or Brian Williams or any other brilliant apparatchik "reporter" for any of this truly fake news? The hell we have!

Some dumbass YouTube user claimed he was kicked off a Delta Airlines flight because complaints were raised by fellow passengers that he was speaking Arabic. Oh the horror! You were an obvious racist if "news" of that did not enrage you and ruin your day and whereupon being notified of it, you did not immediately search for the nearest thobe-wearing, dark-bearded individual you saw, of which there is absolutely no shortage in the Western world today, and exclaim rapturously, "My brother, my fellow world citizen, have you heard about the bigoted indiginities suffered by brother Adam Saleh?!"

In the words of Oliver Darcy writing in The UK Business Insider: 

Many outlets, however, negated to note an important fact: The individual in question was a YouTube prankster known for pulling similar viral stunts. Only after the prankster's claims were disseminated across all corners of the internet did his past enter the picture in a meaningful way. Delta eventually denied his claim.

How about the media adopting the line that Trump is anti-Semitic even though his son-in-law, Jared Kushner is an Orthodox Jew, his daughter Ivanka converted to Judaism to marry him and that his grandchildren from this marriage are Jewish? How about the fact that Donald Trump's White House will feature a kosher kitchen? Ignore all that. He's anti-Semitic because Steve Bannon is his chief strategist and senior counselor, even though there's no evidence of any anti-Semitism on Bannon's part either.

Is this "fake news" enough for you yet?

This same media that is so concerned about Jews—which I suppose is why they coddled the Muslim Brotherhood Leader-in-Chief for eight long years—had nothing to say about the egregious anti-Semitism of John Kerry when he recently told Israel that it could not be both Jewish and democratic. This administration exclaimed in front of the United Nations that the Jewish people are incapable of democracy unless they get hip to the concept of being pushed into the sea by their hateful neighbors, and what do you got? Nothing to see here, folks, move along.

Don't even get me started on this whole Russia hacking nonsense. Yes, Russia hacks us. So has every other rogue country the world has to offer. Madame Mao left secret information out in the open on a banquet plate for them to pick from, for Chrissakes. But, to push an angle that benefits the narrative and not the truth, which is that the DNC was hacked by a fed-up Bernie Sanders supporter who was soon after conveniently murdered, the Democratic party machine and the media who dances to its every beat has to pawn electoral incompetency off on the machinations of Vladimir Putin. You see, we can call Vladimir Putin evil. That's okay. That's just dandy.

Even Rolling Stone, a bastion of fake news if ever there was one, has had enough. On December 30, Matt Taibbi wrote, in a piece sub-titled "Nearly a decade and a half after the Iraq-WMD faceplant, the American press is again asked to co-sign a dubious intelligence assessment": 

On one end of the spectrum, America could have just been the victim of a virtual coup d'etat engineered by a combination of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, which would be among the most serious things to ever happen to our democracy. 

But this could also just be a cynical ass-covering campaign, by a Democratic Party that has seemed keen to deflect attention from its own electoral failures. 

The outgoing Democrats could just be using an over-interpreted intelligence "assessment" to delegitimize the incoming Trump administration and force Trump into an embarrassing political situation: Does he ease up on Russia and look like a patsy, or escalate even further with a nuclear-armed power?

Thanks, Rolling Stone. Keep this up and you just may make up for the college rape epidemic BS that you pushed and the disgusting lionizing of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev that had Margery Eagan and moonbat women everywhere drenching their knickers while indulging Jane Austen-style scenarios involving Flash Bang himself.

Forget John McManiac and Little Lindsey for the sake of sanity. We know they're beholden to the defense industry and all the contracts that flourish under it, so the case for wanting war with Russia, and the subsequent prolonging of efforts against ISIS for several decades, that they're making is obvious.

What gets me is the whole "17 intelligence agencies" BS. I was honestly unaware that the United States, as admittedly and horribly bureaucratic as it is, not only had seventeen members of the "intelligence community," but that apparently even more exist with which to point the tip of the greater-than symbol at. In other words, to say that seventeen intelligence agencies agree on the Russian hacking of "our democracy" insinuates the presence of a few rogue agencies, who I'm sure if they existed would eventually be batter-rammed into line. After all, only John Brennan was spouting this nonsense. Then James Clapper and James Comey piped up. And there's your "seventeen intelligence agencies".

You see, the seventeen intelligence agencies confirming the Russian hacking of the 2016 election in favor of Trump must be every bit as accurate as the sixty-five member coalition that Obama has fighting against ISIS. What made the government choose the number seventeen for this story? I don't know, it's probably a reference to Joe Biden's IQ.

And yet, if the evidence against Russia is so overwhelming, just where the hell is it? Why must this godforsaken government under Obama be so secretive about every damn thing? We couldn't know the details of TPP and now we're told to believe these incompetents with regard to the tipping of the election toward Trump because of Russia despite the lack of any public dissemination of proof. 

Here's the thing: Out of all the nonsense being alleged in this phony report, the one thing that isn't is that this Russian interference changed the vote count. Clapper has said there is no evidence of this. So what is this anti-Russia angle all about then? It's about the heads of all these agencies, all five of them (not seventeen), all of them globalists, merely trying to discredit the nascent Trump presidency. That's all, folks. Simple as that.

By the way, where is the pantsuit on the torture of the young white man in Chicago? She informs us that Putin holds an obvious grudge against her, that Trump is "spouting the Putin line," and that we must believe in the sanctity of the Russian hacking report. When it could really benefit her, and the Democrats in general, to have something to say roundly condemning the bitterness, hatred and division consuming the country—that they entirely caused—and explicitly expressed in the beating and torture of the 18-year-old special needs man by those who forced him to yell "fuck Trump" and "fuck white people," she is silent. Keith Ellison is silent. Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer are silent. I'm not surprised. They're no doubt searching for more fictional stories about Muslim women getting their hijabs knocked off by white men wearing "Make America Great Again" baseball caps to scream about.

Jeepers, I could just scream. I certainly have every night in my dreams since November 5, 2008.

New Year's news and reviews

Yet more philanthropic acts committed in the name of the Religion of Pieces. Thirty-nine people have so far died from a New Year's Eve gun massacre at the Reina nightclub in Istanbul. And even though the city's governor outright called it a terrorist attack, most of the media outlets are saying that the incident "is believed to be a terrorist attack." 
Gee, ya' don't say! And there I was thinking, when I first heard about it, that some used car salesman just had a bad day.
This media really is outstandingly moronic. Thank goodness we now officially have an Obama Ministry of Truth to keep shielding people from reality. The best gift ever to jihadic slaughterers. Makes you so proud, does it not?

*   *   *

Has anybody seen Mitt Romney? Where are his thoughts on Russia and Vladimir Putin, the monster who wants to swallow up the entire world?

*   *   *

Barry Obama has said to the nation in his final New Year's address that "it has been the privilege of my life to serve as your President".
Mr. Obama, I say as sincerely as I can, just go. "Retire" to that $5 million D.C. mansion of yours and I don't want to hear anything from your skinny, phenomenally lazy ass ever again. Nor that of your wife, Mrs. Pouty Lips, nor your degenerate, pot-smoking, bratty progeny. How's that, eh? Now send the damned IRS after me, you freak.
Your presidency has been a privilege for you and that of the corporate masters and heads of the identity politics industry that you served, Obama. No-one else.
You, sir, need to be thankful every day—not that I believe for one moment that you will or ever could be—that so many "bitter clingers" across the country voted for you because they were hammered since the day they were born with instructions to feel guilty and that they had no choice but to vote for the black guy, and that alone, sir, is the only reason you got two terms. White guilt. Not white privilege. White guilt.
Well, that, and millions of illegal aliens who poured into the country since January 20, 2009.

*   *   *

I'm serious, where's Mitt Romney? We desperately need your suggestions with regard to Russia, sir.

*   *   *

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan has said that sanctions against Russia launched by the Obama administration are "overdue". In a statement he issued, Ryan said that the actions being sought against Russia represent an "appropriate way to end eight years of failed policy with Russia".
Not to be outdone, John McCain opined that the Democratic fairy tale that is the Russian hacking of the election on November 8 is "an act of war." McCain seeks a Congressional Select Committee to investigate allegations of Russian interference.
Senator Lindsey Graham also chimed in, all 5-feet-2 of him, waving his arms at the back of the Senate chamber, noting that "bipartisan sanctions will hit Russia hard, particularly Vladimir Putin as an individual."
If there's one grievance I hold against President-elect Donald Trump, it is that he did not attempt to oust Paul Ryan as House Speaker. He should never have endorsed Ryan's primary campaign nor that of McCain.
John McManiac, Lindsey Grahamnesty and RINO "Eddie Munster" Ryan, all best buddies with Obama to the bitter end. How pathetic.

*   *   *

Mitt? Mittens? Would the real Mitt Romney please stand up, please stand up, please stand up ...

Obama's globalist vision dying a long death as 2017 looms

As 2016 is on its way out the door, Obama continues his combination of horrible policies combined with slick indoctrination. In an interview with his former chief strategist and political mafioso David Axlerod, Barry O. stated:

I am confident in this [globalist] vision, because I'm confident that if I had run again, and I articulated it, I think that I could have mobilized the majority of the American people to rally behind it. I know that in conversations that I've had with people around the country, even some people who disagreed with me, they would say the vision, the direction that you point towards is the right one.

Responding to this audacity, Michael Savage opined:

Yes, that's right. Flood America with useless immigrants who don't work. Increase the food stamp rolls by 10.7 million people, a 32 percent jump. Bring in Islamists who are not vetted. Really good job. One terrorist event after another. Oh yeah, we all want your vision. That's what we want, Mr. Obama. We want your vision, we all want to become Beirut or Lebanon itself, we can't wait to see internacine warfare in America. You're great. You turn blacks against the police. You did a super job, Obama.

I might add that Obama, in all of his puerileness and petulancy, is stirring up a new Cold War with Russia, as if we need that. We watched the Berlin Wall come down in 1989 so this big-eared man-child can try to resurrect it again, or something similar. A U.S.-Mexico border wall? Hell to the no. A wall between Europe and Russia all over again? Bring it on! What a marvelous, forward-thinking vision.
Luckily, Putin knows how to act like a grown adult and is not taking the bait that little boy Obama has spread out for him and is waiting until January 20 when a real adult once again takes the reins in the White House.
Also, I'm sure the folks whose 1,100 jobs were recently saved due to Donald Trump's intervention on their behalf really want to continue with Obama's vision which does nothing but reward global corporatists and whose direction is being engineered by the evil madman, George Soros. It really sucks for them that this "vision" was rejected.
I'll say this: If the majority of the American people can be rallied to this pile of stinking, rotting garbage, then the majority of the American people are in a drug haze, 24/7. And when drug problems are documented, these moron liberals want to ruin the doctor-patient relationship rather than crack down on the source of the life-wrecking substances—illegal aliens. That's right, aliens, I said it. There is only one type of immigrant: a legal one, someone who jumps through all the hoops, someone who would run around the block with their underwear on their head because the nation they want to be a part of told them it was required. That, dear reader, is an immigrant. Not someone who can't appreciate sacrifice because they didn't make any by sneaking in and who get rewarded by the powers-that-be just so they can increase their voting base. Those are people who—say it with me—don't belong. Very good, you're learning.
Speaking of aliens, let's not forget the the people of Nebraska, who I'm sure are just thrilled with Obama's vision, the one that just dumped 502 "migrants" in their breadbasket state. A vision that thinks there is a problem because their state is too white and too red.
The same media that told us that Donald Trump could never win and that he didn't stand a chance against the living blood clot known as Hillary Clinton, invented Leninist propaganda such as "hands up, don't shoot" and which kept showing pictures of Trayvon Martin at the age of 12, rather than the 17-year-old thug that he had become, warns us against the horrors of "fake news". What a joke.
Those who pay attention to Breitbart, The Drudge Report and Zero Hedge are, in the words of the brilliant Milo Yiannopoulos, "hateful, misogynistic, racist, anti-Semitic, sexist bigots," according to Lefties. But what they don't realize is that everything they accuse the "alt-right" of being is everything they are. It's opposite world with the liberals. It's just like when Democrats cite the working class; what they really mean is the non-working class.
Watch all the new-found free speech advocates, the same ones burning American flags in front of Trump Tower while the media report on how great and heroic they are, as they say nothing about S. 2493, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 that Obama signed, deep inside which was buried the "Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act," a bill straight out of 1984 in that it resembles Orwell's nightmarish Ministry of Truth. Germany, too, has proposed its own version so that it can cover up the considerable crimes and terrorist attacks of its Islamist migrants. According to Zero Hedge:

Long before the "fake news" meme became a daily topic of extensive conversation on such discredited mainstream portals as CNN and WaPo, H.R. 5181 would task the Secretary of State with coordinating the Secretary of Defense, the Director of National Intelligence, and the Broadcasting Board of Governors to "establish a Center for Information Analysis and Response," which will pinpoint sources of disinformation, analyze data, and—in true dystopic manner—'develop and disseminate' "fact-based narratives" to counter effrontery propaganda. 

In short, long before "fake news" became a major media topic, the US government was already planning its legally-backed crackdown on anything it would eventually label "fake news."

Does anyone care to tell me how this doesn't violate the freedom of speech and expression promised by the First Amendment? Where are all the chattering mouths of the media? Where are all the oh-so-concerned and frightened young people? They're all blabbering about fake news while the American government has officially informed them what is acceptable to report and that everything else is verboten. It doesn't matter, however, since they've been content to do just that for going on fifty years now. They're only too glad to have it confirmed so it can deprive the deplorables of anything approaching reality.
I suppose you could say that Obama's actually working for once, trying to cram an entire third term of damage into his last remaining month in power. Bums can really get a move-on when it's last dibs at the soup line.
I will be so happy when that clock strikes midnight this morning knowing that only twenty days of this insanity remains. Donald Trump is going to have a lot on his plate as if he didn't have enough already.
Happy New Year, and let this upcoming set of twelve months be the one in which America was truly made not just great, but tolerable again.

Lefties have lost all options as 2016 ends

Let me get this straight. First, it was the Electoral College's fault that Hillary Clinton lost the election. Even though the Electoral College was fine and dandy when it was thought that the "Blue Wall" would hold up, suddenly it is a huge oversight on the Founding Fathers' part and needs to be dismantled. We need the popular vote so that California and New York can decide our elections henceforth and forever more, say the liberals.
Then it was Russian hacking of our "democracy," (a.k.a. would-be oligarchy) although not a shred of evidence exists to confirm this and no-one is alleging this to the extent that CIA political hack head John Brennan is. Funny how the CIA was the bugaboo of the Left for decades and that their intelligence was always suspect, especially during the Iraq War—but now the agency's word is sacrosanct and we should be prepared to launch war against Putin posthaste.
It seems as though George W. Bush might be given a reprieve of sorts. These days, if anything goes wrong, it can be blamed on Putin. Global warming? Putin. The Christmas tree dried up too soon and all its needles fell off? A conspiracy by the Kremlin, quite obviously. Your toilet is backed up? Putin's responsible for that too. Your girlfriend left you not because you're an annoying, whiny hipster twat who wears goofy fucking glasses that do nothing to boost your non-existent intelligence factor. She defected to the Russian government at Putin's behest.
At the soiree she held for her donors, Clinton said, "We have to recognize that, as the latest report made clear, Vladimir Putin himself directed the covert cyber attacks against our electoral system, against our democracy." Ummm, we don't have to recognize anything from you, you friggin' sore-ass loser, go away already! The year 2016 has taken so many away from us, now adding George Michael to its list, but Hillary Clinton is still around. What's the deal, 2016? You finally removed Fidel Castro from this earth, no doubt one of your better acts. Now finish the job. And don't forget George Soros either. You only have four days left.
Since the Russian angle is going nowhere in a hurry, it's back to castigating FBI head James Comey, even though Comey has let Hillary Clinton off the hook twice, citing a lack of evidence of "intent," even though that was never part of the statute. You see, his recommendation to Congress that the investigation into her malfeasance be re-opened as a result of the discoveries made on Anthony Weiner's laptop assisted in her losing the election because, oh gee, it made her look untrustworthy. If any member of the American electorate did not already regard Madame Mao this way by the time Comey sent his now-infamous letter, that says more about them than anything Comey has ever done. Isn't it odd how Comey declaring Mrs. Clinton innocent yet again before the election had no impact with regard to her perceived irresponsibility and treachery?
And if all else fails, just blame the racism of the deplorables who voted for Donald Trump. Clinton regards herself as perfect, therefore so should 100 percent of the American people. If you voted for Trump, you're a white nationalist, a "bitter clinger," which I'm sure comes as a huge shock to the 35 percent of Hispanics and 12 percent of blacks who voted for Mr. Trump.
It is true that white America, especially its rural counterpart, voted for Trump enthusiastically, but does any Leftie idiot—if that's not a redundant phrase—want to give me a reason why white people in the heartland and the Rust Belt and in states like Idaho which are being flooded with "Syrian" jihadists migrants could cast their votes for Hillary and the Democrats? There are still enough whites in America who haven't been completely poisoned by left-wing union-controlled public schools, out-of-control Government, a complicit media and Marxist college professors yet. They still had enough faith in their families and communities to try to reverse the damage before it was too late. That's really deplorable of them, right? They've only been told about 2,956,743 times (and counting) since the start of the election process in spring 2015 that they have privilege that no-one else in the country has, that refusing to give up their God-given right to self-defense is the reason why the San Bernadino and Orlando massacres happened, and that they're responsible for why the country is so oppressive and unfair. And yet it's a complete mystery to the Clinton campaign why it lost.
MTV, an irrelevant cable channel if ever there was one, can produce a piece entitled "2017 Resolutions for White Guys," in which honkies and crackers are told that "black lives just matter" and that All Lives Matter is not the opposite of that. They are told to stop using the word "woke" as an adjective (yep, me neither), to stop something called "mansplaining" and that if they happen to be judges, to cease allowing rapists on college campuses to go free. Way to give cover to Rolling Stone's blatant lies, MTV.
Yet, in the brilliant words of black conservative, Crystal Wright, "Would we ever see a New Year's resolution produced by MTV telling black men to stop killing each other in inner cities like Chicago, stop impregnating black women to the tune of over 70 percent, marry black women. Will we ever see a video like that from MTV? No, because you know why? Because that would be racist." Somebody please inform Crystal Wright that she is obviously a white supremacist.
And there's our heroic, supposed President, sticking it to America and Israel on his way out the door, as we all knew he would. He obviously took his pen and his phone to his Hawaii headquarters. First, he scrapped the National Security Entrance-Exit system, a 2002 program that enjoyed both Democrat and Republican support that increased the screening of travelers from specific countries. Trump can likely revive the program once in office, but the United States will fly totally blind for the next month, as undesirables continue to pour into the country between now and January 20, 2017. If a terrorist incident occurs, therefore, the Democratic party machine and the media can blame Trump's "rhetoric".
Next, Obama invoked the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, a 1953 law protecting defined land areas from oil and gas drilling. Once invoked, it cannot be repealed by the next President, although the courts may step in to throw Obama's decision out or Congress can amend the provision. The Obama Administration crowed that, having invoked the drilling law, in coöperation with Trudeau's Canada, it would be "decades" before drilling could be an issue again. This was clearly a gift to the whackjob environmentalist Democratic donors and a way to scupper Trump's promises to make America more self-reliant on energy needs.
Thirdly, Obama opined to National Public Radio that Donald Trump should not seek to rule by Executive Order, but go through Congress to get what he wants. Technically, Obama is right about this, this is the way things should be done. But this is just more astonishing hypocrisy from Obama and his declaration that "my strong preference has always been to legislate when I can get legislation done" is a naked lie. Plus, it's not so much the number of executive orders—in Obama's case, it's 260—it's the nature of them, and Obama's ERs have been especially damaging and retrograde. This can be seen to blow a whistle and put the spotlight on Trump given past criticisms of Obama's executive orders. The problem is, it might take executive orders on Trump's part to undue the considerable damage done.
Finally, Obama sponsored a U.N. resolution that harshly criticizes Israeli settlements on Palestinian lands, which is ridiculous as these are lands won by Israel in 1967 and therefore not Palestinian land. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has accused Obama of crafting and submitting the resolution to the U.N. to undermine his leadership and Israel's borders. So much for the peaceful transfer of power.
Furthermore, Obama has done all of this while supposedly on vacation. This man and his family have spent $85 million of our money on trips, yet he has the audacity to assert that he can finally have a real vacation once he—thank you, God—leaves the Oval Office.
By the way, what is up with the friendship bracelets between Obama and Joe Biden? Does it get any more disturbing than this? It's great that a President and his veep get along so well. But, friendship bracelets with flowers and smiley-faces?! Vladimir Putin was supposedly close with ambassador Andrey Karlov, shot by a jihadist in Ankara a week ago. I doubt they had friendship bracelets, though. John Kerry's pink girly bicycle. Obama's knee pads. And now friendship bracelets. It's no wonder Russia, China, Iran and the rest of the world laughs at the United States and does as it likes.
On the bright side, the electors have done their job, despite all the crybaby sob-stories and death threats from frightened little progressives. Even despite that scholarly video released by Hollywood luminaries who urge the electors to "act like Hamilton," despite the fact that the actual Alexander Hamilton would have run a mile from these lunatics. Suddenly the Federalist Papers and the Constitution mean something to these subversive Commie airheads.
Donald Trump will, after all the crap that has gone down since the morning of November 9, be President of the United States. Notwithstanding the efforts of the self-styled hero Chris Suprun, for whom no such heroic accounts exist, and the Christian fundamentalist headcase, Art Sisneros. Go suck a hotrod's tailpipe with the engine running, fellas. It's all you're good for.
Meanwhile, earlier this month, in Britain, Prime Minister Theresa May won a resounding vote in the House of Commons regarding her timeline for invoking Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, officially triggering Brexit. As it stands, Brexit will be launched by the end of March 2017. After the demands for a second referendum and the High Court challenge by Remoaners, no less.
What next, Lefties? What next? All you do is lose. Keep it up. Oh wait, you can't. There's nothing left for you to do or to try. It's been fun, snowflakes, but now the voice of the people, in Britain and in America, is going to be honored. If it's really that tough to take, I'm sure there's a bridge somewhere in your vicinity to help ease the pain. Use it.

Secretary of State Rex: Steady at the till ... er, son?

It looks as if Rex Tillerson is President-elect Trump's pick for the position of Secretary of State. I've heard some things about Mr. Tillerson, the CEO of ExxonMobil since 2006, as have you, dear reader. Tillerson is also the 33rd President of the Boy Scouts of America and endorsed the inclusion of homosexuals as scout masters. I prefer to concentrate on the fact that Tillerson's involvement with the Boy Scouts demonstrates a desire to craft young boys into responsible men, give them some focus and some male mentoring in an increasingly fatherless societal environment and an understanding of the value of the environment.
Tillerson has also backed the Trans-Pacific Partnership and other free trade agreements, the Common Core national education experiment, and, as Exxon's chief executive, a carbon tax and the Paris Climate Accords. In essence, Tillerson maintains a trendy stance on social issues and has globalist leanings and sympathies, and that's disappointing.
The Exxon chief wasn't the most qualified for this position and has rattled some conservatives as too establishment and who would have been at home in a Jeb Bush administration.
The Secretary of State, however, does not set national policy. Tillerson was chosen because he, like the President he will answer to, is an outsider and a very successful businessman. Tillerson was also chosen, I highly believe, because he understands Russia and its president, Vladimir Putin. Tillerson has known Putin for 25 years and it is essential that the United States thaws out its relationship to this nuclear-armed and resurgent superpower. Tillerson could be crucial in keeping Russia onside as we attempt to dismantle the Iran deal.
I do not care one iota if Russia had in any way hacked the recent election, especially since I don't believe for one moment that it did, as the CIA now alleges. As far as whackjob conspiracy theories go, 9/11 being an inside job and the moon landings having been faked have far more credibility than this. See, the CIA has been poisoned with a useless political hack named John Brennan, courtesy of Obama who has used his reverse Midas touch—as in everything he touches turns to shite—to turn it into just another disruptive government agency that pushes climate change as America's and the world's top-most priority. Just take the "Intelligence" bit out of the CIA and that's what it currently is. Therefore, I place absolutely no stock in it.
Even James Comey's FBI has said no proof exists of any direct Russian influence in the election and the same liberal talking-heads obsessing over it aren't keen to provide the proof either. It's not hard to see why. It doesn't exist.
This Russia-bashing won't end until Trump takes office on January 20—it's just more garbage that we have to put up with from the Left in their pathetic attempt to certify Hillary because Madame Mao was just so damn perfect in every conceivable way that she couldn't possibly have lost an election.
First it was the argument that only the popular vote is legitimate and we needed to ditch the Electoral College, even though the Electoral College was fine when it was thought that the Democrats' "Blue Wall" would defeat Trump. Then it was the recount effort so Jill Stein could enrich herself from the donations of stupid suburbanite progressives. Electors have been deluged with correspondences, demanding they stop Trump and vote for Hillary. Now, golly gee, it's the Russians. How exactly the Russians helped to get Trump into office is, and I'm sure forever will be, unrevealed due to the aforementioned lack of evidence. What will these cretins try next?
As for the electors, one of them, a douchebag in Texas, has said he will not fulfill his role as an Electoral College member by voting for Trump. Would Chris Suprun, who asserts that he feels he would be supporting a king by voting for Trump (after eight years of imperial rule by Barry, no less), have raised the same stink if the pantsuit had won Texas? That's right, I don't think so either.
Suprun's reticence combined with the resignation of Art Sisneros, who claimed that Trump as President didn't fulfill some Biblical prophecy or some such fanatical lunacy, makes me think that there's something very wrong in Texas and that the Lone Star State's legislature had better seriously consider passing a bill during Trump's first year in office that binds that state's electors to the Electoral College result.


  No, I'm not Glenn Beck, although I am just as much of a headcase. So, do you think these glasses make me look smart or even half-way respectable? Photo source: Twitter
Let's not forget that Stephen Chris Suprun, this horned rim spectacles-wearing moron subscribed to Ashley Madison using the same address as a dubious 9/11 charity while bankrupt and unemployed and married with three kids and used a PR firm run by the Alinskyite agitator Van Jones, according to an excellent expose by Zero Hedge. C'mon, admit it, dear reader—you knew that Suprun was no clean conservative. He has spoken of the possibility of voting for the Twerker, for Chrissakes. 
For someone to bitch this much about Trump's Electoral College victory, while wrapping himself up in some completely bullshit narrative that Trump divides the country and rejects the "shining city on a hill" vision of America, points to some seriously insalubrious stuff about this twerp and his private life. I'm not exactly surprised. Disgusted, yes; surprised, no.
I cannot wait until December 19 when the electors finally confirm Donald J. Trump as President of the United States, and all these vile Lefties and Never Trump purist conservatives can no longer try to derail him.
Please don't talk to me about Rex Tillerson while madmen like Suprun and Sisneros are still at large in our society, while media giants like CNN still refuse to answer questions over Donna Brazile's leaked debate questions and other such dishonest actions against a gullible public, while the murder of a young Bernie Sanders supporter goes uninvestigated, and while the dispatching of a Supreme Court justice, who was found dead with a pillow over his head, whose bodily fluids were flushed away and whose demise was deemed not worthy of an autopsy, goes unexplained. 
Trump didn't promote backstabber Mitt Romney, an anti-Russia saber-rattler, or Bob Corker, the man who made the Iran nukes deal possible and favorite of the Republican Senatorial elite. In fact, I really hope that, twenty years from now, I can read in some Secret Service agent's memoirs that less than five minutes into their meeting, Trump slapped Corker across the face, laughed and said, "Get the fuck out of here, Bob."
Tillerson will promote a new and friendlier relationship with Russia which is exactly what is called for at this time in world history.
In other words, with Tillerson, we won't have that World War III that neoconservatives have been salivating over and about which Mr. Father-Knows-Best, Chris Suprun, would have nothing to say.